2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iMER: Iterative process of entity relationship and business process model extraction from the requirements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The state of art approaches [13], [14] that are based on the same tool inputs as our approach, namely acceptance criteria, and user stories, focus mainly on test case generation. In [18] the BPMN generation was performed from textual requirements, as for the user stories, the approach just generates the BPMN operations. Moreover, they do not use acceptance criteria with user stories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The state of art approaches [13], [14] that are based on the same tool inputs as our approach, namely acceptance criteria, and user stories, focus mainly on test case generation. In [18] the BPMN generation was performed from textual requirements, as for the user stories, the approach just generates the BPMN operations. Moreover, they do not use acceptance criteria with user stories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of NLP was essential to analyze the specifications. In [18] iterative approach of models extraction from the requirements (iMER) is developed to automatically generate the entity relationships model and business process model from text requirements and user stories. Their approach is made iterative in order to extract the component of each model.…”
Section: Methods 21 Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Manually extracting conceptual models is a time-consuming, error-prone task. The use of automated transformation aids in the preservation of requirement traceability [1]. One of the most difficult aspects of developing an automated ERM is the lack of complete natural language rules for mapping natural language requirements into an ERM [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%