2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-6697-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iMarmot: an integrative platform for comparative and functional genomics of marmots

Abstract: Background: Marmots are large Holarctic rodents with unique biological features, making them potential animal models in various research fields. Due to the rapid accumulation of the genetic data in marmots, a highly integrative database is urgent needed. Description: iMarmot is freely available on the web at http://www.marmotdb.org/ and currently contains the biological information of 14 marmots, genomic sequence of 6 marmots, syntenic relationship and orthologs among 3 marmots, and expression profiles of seve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, alignment of clean reads with the mouse reference genome (GRCm38) was conducted utilizing TopHat. Quantification and normalization of gene expression were conducted by Cufflinks in RPKM (reads per million per kilo bases) [ 26 ]. The DESeq software was utilized to analyze DEGs through a comparison between the Ad-GFP and Ad-SFRP4 cohorts [ 27 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, alignment of clean reads with the mouse reference genome (GRCm38) was conducted utilizing TopHat. Quantification and normalization of gene expression were conducted by Cufflinks in RPKM (reads per million per kilo bases) [ 26 ]. The DESeq software was utilized to analyze DEGs through a comparison between the Ad-GFP and Ad-SFRP4 cohorts [ 27 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Perl script was employed over 0.25% low-quality bases (Phred quality score < 20) or over 10% Ns for trimming the reads with contaminated adapters. The alignment of clean reads with the mouse reference genome (GRCm38) was subsequently performed using TopHat, whereas the quantification and normalization of gene expression were performed by Cufflinks in RPKM (reads per million per kilobases) [ 19 ]. Moreover, DESeq software was used to analyze DEGs and draw a comparison between the Ad-GFP and Ad-C1QL1 cohorts [ 20 ], with the false discovery rate (FDR) being employed to set a significant threshold for the p -value in various tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%