2013
DOI: 10.1080/02757206.2013.761211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imagining Mobility at the “End of the World”

Abstract: Chile's geographical remoteness has largely defined the imaginaries people share about this Latin American country. Despite its historical image as finis terrae ("the end of the world"), migrants from all corners found their way to these isolated peripheral lands. Thanks to new means of transport and communication, Chile nowadays is as exposed to the global circulation of people, objects and ideas as the rest of the world. Based on a combination of archival research and ethnographic fieldwork, this article tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the proponents of the mobilities paradigm have now started to study such topics as how waiting and stillness are "incorporated into the practices of moving" (Cresswell, 2012, p. 648), mobilities scholars have only began to pay more systematic attention to the obstacles to and governance of mobility (Baerenholdt, 2013;Coles & Hall, 2011;Cohen, 2012;see Richardson, 2013 for a special issue on borders and mobilities). This is illustrative of the growing emphasis in mobilities studies on the significance of power differentials for one's ability to move (Cresswell, 2010, Glick Schiller andSalazar 2013). While the mobilities paradigm is at least partly "a result of a dissatisfaction with the valorization of forms of stillness -rooted and the sedentary" (Cresswell, 2012, p. 648) that has characterized earlier social science approaches, which tended to fix people and practices in bounded territories, mobilities theorists have yet to propose a theoretical framework accounting for the interconnectedness of stasis and movement in various kinds of mobilities.…”
Section: The Mobilities Paradigm As a Non-eurocentric Approach To Thementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Although the proponents of the mobilities paradigm have now started to study such topics as how waiting and stillness are "incorporated into the practices of moving" (Cresswell, 2012, p. 648), mobilities scholars have only began to pay more systematic attention to the obstacles to and governance of mobility (Baerenholdt, 2013;Coles & Hall, 2011;Cohen, 2012;see Richardson, 2013 for a special issue on borders and mobilities). This is illustrative of the growing emphasis in mobilities studies on the significance of power differentials for one's ability to move (Cresswell, 2010, Glick Schiller andSalazar 2013). While the mobilities paradigm is at least partly "a result of a dissatisfaction with the valorization of forms of stillness -rooted and the sedentary" (Cresswell, 2012, p. 648) that has characterized earlier social science approaches, which tended to fix people and practices in bounded territories, mobilities theorists have yet to propose a theoretical framework accounting for the interconnectedness of stasis and movement in various kinds of mobilities.…”
Section: The Mobilities Paradigm As a Non-eurocentric Approach To Thementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Existing research conducted in the world's developing tourism regions has been dominated by planning and management investigations (Cohen & Cohen, ). Cohen and Cohen () pointed out that although a number of mobility theorists, anthropologists, and migration researchers have attempted to analyze mobility in Cameroon (Pelican, ), Israel (Kalir, ), Chile (Salazar, ), and Africa (Hannam & Butler, ), operationalizing the mobility approach as an overarching, theoretical paradigm is lacking in tourism studies from the emerging world regions. China, as an example, features an increasingly significant flow of tourists en route across the globe; however, what has remained deficient is an understanding of Chinese outbound tourists' expectations and experiences.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demarcate such an understanding, scholars introduced the linguistic convention of "regimes of (im)mobility" (Baker 2016: 152ff; see also Glick Schiller and Salazar 2013;Salazar 2012;Shamir 2005). In a nutshell, regimes-of-(im)mobility can be defined as Rationalized systems for the regulation of movement-of people, goods, capital, and certain forms of knowledge-that encompass both infrastructural and discursive technologies.…”
Section: The Effectiveness Of Regimes-of-(im)mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%