2018
DOI: 10.1177/0276236618803308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imagining Experiencing an Event in the Future Inflates Certainty That It Occurred in the Past

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We determined our sample size with a set of power analyses, one for each hypothesis. For Hypothesis 1, we used similar materials in a previous study in our laboratory and found an imagination inflation effect of d = .72 (Calvillo et al, 2018). For Hypothesis 2, we used data from a previous study that appeared most similar to the present study (Lindner & Echterhoff, 2015), which found an effect of d = .50.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We determined our sample size with a set of power analyses, one for each hypothesis. For Hypothesis 1, we used similar materials in a previous study in our laboratory and found an imagination inflation effect of d = .72 (Calvillo et al, 2018). For Hypothesis 2, we used data from a previous study that appeared most similar to the present study (Lindner & Echterhoff, 2015), which found an effect of d = .50.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, our 9% shift in overconfidence is similar to that demonstrated in a recent study on ‘imagination inflation’, whereby imagining a hypothetical event increased people's certainty that the event really happened. This mechanism is thought to contribute to problems associated with recovered memory therapy [ 69 ]. Third, our effect size is similar to a related illusion in which people who watched a video of a magician performing the tablecloth trick were more confident in their success actually performing the trick than people who merely thought about performing the trick but did not watch the video [ 28 ].…”
Section: Mini Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%