2018
DOI: 10.1177/0021989418777840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imagining Africa’s futures in two Caine Prize-winning stories: Henrietta Rose-Innes’s “Poison” and NoViolet Bulawayo’s “Hitting Budapest”

Abstract: Since its launch in 1999, the annual Caine Prize for African short stories has assumed a dominant position on the continent’s literary landscape. It has been hailed for the exposure it provides for its winners who are mostly budding writers. Expectedly, it has also attracted stinging criticism, especially for what is perceived to be its legitimization of stereotypical narratives about Africa. In this article, I examine how the two winning entries of 2008 and 2011 represent contemporary African realities and in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aghogho Akpome’s (2020) contribution, “Imagining Africa’s futures in two Caine Prize winning stories”, tackles generic boundaries between the short story and the novel by examining the two winning entries of 2008 and 2011, Henrietta Rose-Innes’s “Poison” and NoViolet Bulawayo’s “Hitting Budapest”. Against the background of recent critiques of the prize for its alleged emphasis on “poverty porn”, he examines the alternative ways in which the two authors use the genre of the short story to imagine African futures.…”
Section: Special Issue Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aghogho Akpome’s (2020) contribution, “Imagining Africa’s futures in two Caine Prize winning stories”, tackles generic boundaries between the short story and the novel by examining the two winning entries of 2008 and 2011, Henrietta Rose-Innes’s “Poison” and NoViolet Bulawayo’s “Hitting Budapest”. Against the background of recent critiques of the prize for its alleged emphasis on “poverty porn”, he examines the alternative ways in which the two authors use the genre of the short story to imagine African futures.…”
Section: Special Issue Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%