2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging to predict checkpoint inhibitor outcomes in cancer. A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strengths of this work are the large sample size, the multicenter design and extensive hyperparameter optimization. This is the largest work published on radiomics for prediction of checkpoint inhibitor treatment outcomes in any malignancy [21]. This large size adds to the weight of the presented conclusion.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The strengths of this work are the large sample size, the multicenter design and extensive hyperparameter optimization. This is the largest work published on radiomics for prediction of checkpoint inhibitor treatment outcomes in any malignancy [21]. This large size adds to the weight of the presented conclusion.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This makes radiomics a cheap and non-invasive modality to, for example, discern benign from malignant lung nodules [18], estimate prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients [19] and assess mutation status in glioblastoma [20]. Regarding prediction of checkpoint inhibitor treatment outcomes, promising findings have been published, particularly in NSCLC patients [21].…”
Section: Radiomics Are By Now An Established Modality For Diagnosis P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, sex, World Health Organisation (WHO) performance score, serum lactate dehydrogenase and stage of disease have been shown to be associated with response. [6][7][8] Furthermore, the presence of symptomatic brain metastases is associated with a low response rate. 9,10 Unfortunately, no single biomarker is currently available that can be confidently relied upon to predict ICI outcome for the majority of advanced melanoma patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous clinical prognostic factors have been examined. For example, sex, World Health Organisation (WHO) performance score, serum lactate dehydrogenase and stage of disease have been shown to be associated with response 6–8 . Furthermore, the presence of symptomatic brain metastases is associated with a low response rate 9,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%