2011
DOI: 10.1017/s1431927611001607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging the Tissue Response Around Brain-Implanted Microdevices

Abstract: Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2011 in Nashville, Tennessee, USA, August 7–August 11, 2011.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of scar tissue around chronically implanted neural micro-electrode arrays can significantly decrease the quality of the recorded signals, often rendering the devices unusable (Szarowski et al, 2003; Williams et al, 1999; Woolley et al, 2011). This well-known problem has led to a push towards less invasive neural implants, such as electrocorticography (ECoG), and more recently, micro-ECoG (Figure 1), which sit on top of the cortical surface rather than penetrating into it (Gierthmuehlen et al, 2011; Kitzmiller et al, 2006; Thongpang et al, 2011; Viventi et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The formation of scar tissue around chronically implanted neural micro-electrode arrays can significantly decrease the quality of the recorded signals, often rendering the devices unusable (Szarowski et al, 2003; Williams et al, 1999; Woolley et al, 2011). This well-known problem has led to a push towards less invasive neural implants, such as electrocorticography (ECoG), and more recently, micro-ECoG (Figure 1), which sit on top of the cortical surface rather than penetrating into it (Gierthmuehlen et al, 2011; Kitzmiller et al, 2006; Thongpang et al, 2011; Viventi et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although there has been extensive research into in vivo biological responses to penetrating neural micro-electrode arrays (MEAs) (Williams et al, 2007; Woolley et al, 2011), there has been little investigation into tissue responses to MEAs implanted on the surface of the cerebral cortex. The assumption that these devices elicit little tissue response is based on results from traditional histological studies of brains implanted with surface electrode arrays (Henle et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%