2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging the circumstellar envelope of OH 26.5+0.6

Abstract: Abstract. Using the Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland-Association (BIMA) Millimeter Array, we were able to map the extreme OH/IR star, OH 26.5+0.6, in the 12 CO J = 1-0 line transition. The CO emission is partially resolved with a deconvolved source size of 8.5 × 5.5 . The spectrum shows that the blue-shifted emission is missing, most likely due to interstellar absorption. By modelling the infrared spectral energy distribution, we derive a dust mass loss rate of 1.9 × 10 −6 M yr −1 . From this we are able to place an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model was refined in Fong et al (2002), where OH 26.5 was mapped in the CO J = 1-0 line with the BIMA interferometer, and where the ISO SWS and LWS spectrum were used as well to constrain the SED modelling. Pure silicate grains and silicate core water-ice mantle grains were used.…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model was refined in Fong et al (2002), where OH 26.5 was mapped in the CO J = 1-0 line with the BIMA interferometer, and where the ISO SWS and LWS spectrum were used as well to constrain the SED modelling. Pure silicate grains and silicate core water-ice mantle grains were used.…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a small outer radius can in fact be excluded. Fong et al (2002) mapped CO and detected it to 7 × 10 17 cm correspoding to about 3.3 . This should correspond to the CO photodissociation radius, and the outer radius of the dust should extent beyond this.…”
Section: Appendix B: Oh 265mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the mass loss rate estimate by the IR method for AFGL 3068 (Le Bertre 1997) is ∼3 times larger than by the CO method (G02). Another possible example, OH/IR 26.5+0.6, has been studied by Justtanont et al (1996) and Fong et al (2002) who find evidence for a sudden increase of the mass loss rate, by a factor ≥50, about 200 years ago. Other cases of deficiency of CO emission as compared to the IR energy distribution have been identified among OH/IR sources by Heske et al (1990).…”
Section: Iras Nameṁṁṁmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For OH 26.5+0.6, Suh & Kwon (2013) could reproduce the observed image at 8.7 µm obtained by Chesneau et al (2005) using the dust model image of R out = 3 × 10 4 AU. However, the CO(J=1-0) image size of the object is much smaller (4700 AU; Fong et al 2002). This may mean that the gas mass-loss is not as effective as the dust mass-loss for high mass-loss rate OH/IR stars.…”
Section: 2ṁ -Color Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%