2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging Technologies for High Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with point 2D parameters, such as point A and point B, dose–volume histogram (DVH) parameters with the effective visualization of target volumes and OAR were considered to be more accurate for dose assessment in 3D BT . Furthermore, some DVH parameters, such as D 90 ‐HR CTV (the dose covering 90% of the high‐risk clinical target volume) for tumors and D 2cc (the minimum dose in the 2cc most irradiated tissue volume) for OAR, have been demonstrated to be predictive of the tumor control probability and occurrence of LSE for OAR .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with point 2D parameters, such as point A and point B, dose–volume histogram (DVH) parameters with the effective visualization of target volumes and OAR were considered to be more accurate for dose assessment in 3D BT . Furthermore, some DVH parameters, such as D 90 ‐HR CTV (the dose covering 90% of the high‐risk clinical target volume) for tumors and D 2cc (the minimum dose in the 2cc most irradiated tissue volume) for OAR, have been demonstrated to be predictive of the tumor control probability and occurrence of LSE for OAR .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, compared with CT image guidance, MR image guidance is associated with greater accuracy in evaluating tumor infiltration into parametria and clearer soft tissue delineation between cervix, uterus and vagina. 31 Similarly, at our institution, like many centers across the country, we are transitioning our practice into 3-dimension image-based brachytherapy from orthogonal imaging for treatment planning. This would potentially allow for better tumor delineation with dosimetric parameters as outlined in guidelines by The Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology working group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; and (iii) outcome data: BT parameters, HR‐CTV dose, dose parameters for OAR, survival rates. Because no validated tool exists for assessing the quality of studies that evaluate imaging technologies, we searched the references and adopted the previously used methods assessing the quality of included studies via several questions . The four parameters used to evaluate the studies are as follows: Was the cohort of patients in the study representative of the patients who will receive the treatment in practice? Have the authors described the procedure in enough detail so that it can be reproduced? Was a statistical test comparing the imaging technologies reported? Is the study prospective? …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%