2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2010.5650831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging sonar-aided navigation for autonomous underwater harbor surveillance

Abstract: In this paper we address the problem of driftfree navigation for underwater vehicles performing harbor surveillance and ship hull inspection. Maintaining accurate localization for the duration of a mission is important for a variety of tasks, such as planning the vehicle trajectory and ensuring coverage of the area to be inspected. Our approach only uses onboard sensors in a simultaneous localization and mapping setting and removes the need for any external infrastructure like acoustic beacons. We extract dens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
112
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
112
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are many technologies to assist in navigation for land or air based vehicles, these technologies do not necessarily transfer well to the underwater environment. Global Positioning System (GPS) may be referenced using underwater acoustic beacons [1], however a system may not always be available, or the accuracy good enough, for tasks such as exploration [2] or underwater inspection [3] [4]. Although inertial navigation systems are unaffected by being underwater, they are costly and subject to drift [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While there are many technologies to assist in navigation for land or air based vehicles, these technologies do not necessarily transfer well to the underwater environment. Global Positioning System (GPS) may be referenced using underwater acoustic beacons [1], however a system may not always be available, or the accuracy good enough, for tasks such as exploration [2] or underwater inspection [3] [4]. Although inertial navigation systems are unaffected by being underwater, they are costly and subject to drift [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, underwater optical systems may suffer from poor visibility [9]. A practical alternative is acoustic imaging which being based on acoustic waves is less susceptible to propagation attenuation [3][10] [11]. The use of acoustic waves also allows accurate estimation of the range to an object, though the angle estimation is typically more ambiguous than in optical systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions to this problem use either spectral methods [4,5], or feature-based methods [6]. In either case, these techniques have several applications, such as underwater simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) [7,8] and photomosaicing [9,10]. However, previous work produces strictly 2D mosaics or 3-degree of freedom (DOF) motion estimates (relative x, y, and heading).…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8.2.2 to combine onboard navigation information with sonar registration based on automated dense feature extraction [34]. We focus on imaged areas that are locally flat, such as the open areas of ship hulls and the seafloor.…”
Section: Loop Closure: Ship Hull Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Smoothing as an alternative to filtering: the use of nontraditional acoustic range measurements to improve AUV navigation [18] • Relocalizing in an existing map: localizing and controlling an AUV using natural features using a forward looking sonar [23] • Loop closure used to bound error and uncertainty: combining AUV motion estimates with observations of features on a ship's hull to produce accurate hull reconstructions [34] A common theme for all three applications is the use of pose graph representations and associated estimation algorithms that exploit the graphical model structure of the underlying problem. First we will overview the evolution of the SLAM problem in the following section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%