The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1111/add.14259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging resilience and recovery in alcohol dependence

Abstract: Neuroimaging research has uncovered neurobiological markers that appear to be linked to resilience and improved recovery capacities that are furthermore influenced by various factors such as gender or genetics. Consequently, future system-oriented approaches may help to establish a broad neuroscience-based research framework for alcohol dependence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent review highlighted the need to delve into emotional regulation and the moderating role of impulsivity in alcohol consumption [7]. Likewise, the evidence of differences in the pattern of neural activation between individuals with high risk of resilient alcoholism and those who are vulnerable concerning the mechanisms of emotional regulation has sparked interest in the identification of markers of resilience in alcohol addiction [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review highlighted the need to delve into emotional regulation and the moderating role of impulsivity in alcohol consumption [7]. Likewise, the evidence of differences in the pattern of neural activation between individuals with high risk of resilient alcoholism and those who are vulnerable concerning the mechanisms of emotional regulation has sparked interest in the identification of markers of resilience in alcohol addiction [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A MoCA score has previously been used to classify subjects with cognitive recovery after cognitive training in the context of a stroke, using the very same cut-off of <26 [41]. Other variables of interest were systematically recorded, including parameters previously described in the literature as potential predictive factors of poorer recovery from alcohol-related cognitive impairment, i.e., sex, age [42], age of onset of AUD [43], number of previous detoxifications [21,23], daily alcohol consumption, cannabis use disorder [44] and tobacco use disorder [21], body mass index (BMI), metabolic syndrome [45], and cirrhosis [46].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two factors most reported as impairing cognitive recovery are age [19,20] and the number of previous detoxifications due to reduced brain plasticity [21,22]. Additionally, other specific factors might influence brain recovery processes, i.e., genotype-dependent neuronal (re)growth, interfering effects of psychiatric comorbidities, additional smoking or use of marijuana, early onset of alcohol abuse, and sex-specific neural recovery effects [23]. It therefore appears crucial to document sex differences in the processes leading to cognitive impairment and subsequent recovery [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of epigenetics is rapidly developing in AUD and might help explain some of the environmental components as they interact with the genetic architecture [5][6][7][8]. Several mechanisms contribute to epigenetic regulation, broadly defined as changes in gene expression without DNA sequence alterations, including histone modifications, non-coding RNA, and DNA methylation changes [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%