2006
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/15144573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: what is the most appropriate imaging protocol?

Abstract: Pulmonary embolism is the leading cause of death in pregnancy. Despite the difficulties in clinical diagnosis and the concerns regarding radiation of the fetus, the British Thoracic Society guidelines for imaging pulmonary embolism do not specifically address the issue of imaging for pulmonary embolism in this group. This communication discusses the difficulties of diagnosis and imaging pulmonary embolism in pregnancy and proposes a suitable imaging protocol. Clinical exclusion of patients from further imaging… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
52
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study, only 2% had a high probability scan result. 23,25,[29][30][31]33,[38][39][40][41] The follow-up of untreated women after a normal or low probability scan showed no adverse effects. A normal scan will exclude PE and a high probability scan has a positive predictive value of 85 to 90% but the sensitivity is only 41% with a specificity of 97%.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In one study, only 2% had a high probability scan result. 23,25,[29][30][31]33,[38][39][40][41] The follow-up of untreated women after a normal or low probability scan showed no adverse effects. A normal scan will exclude PE and a high probability scan has a positive predictive value of 85 to 90% but the sensitivity is only 41% with a specificity of 97%.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,31,38 When the pretest clinical probability of a PE is low the finding of a low probability VQ scan is as reliable as a CT angiogram to exclude a pulmonary embolism, and a high clinical probability and a high probability VQ scan is enough evidence to start treatment with a positive predictive value of 85 to 90%. 23,31,35,38 If the clinical probability of PE is high and the VQ scan is not diagnostic further investigations should be done to exclude the diagnosis. 23,25,29 Venous compression duplex ultrasound (VCUS).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The rate of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the peripartum period is fivefold higher in comparison to the same aged non-pregnant female [2]. This increased risk of peripartum pulmonary embolism (PPE) is a combined effect of hypercoagulability, venous stasis and vascular injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%