Imaging of polarized components of Cerenkov light and luminescence of water during carbon‐ion irradiation

Yamamoto, Seiichi; Yabe, Takuya; Akagi, Takashi; Hirano, Yoshiyuki

doi:10.1002/mp.14600

Cited by 4 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 16 publications

(35 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similarly, Yamamoto and al. pursued promising Cherenkov signal removal using a set of two perpendicular polarizers for carbon-ion irradiation 17 . Given the results obtained from our AoLP analysis, that approach method should work on the beam central axis where Cherenkov radiation is mostly emitted at 0 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While Cherenkov spectra and intensity are well known, fewer work have looked into characterizing and using the Cherenkov radiation polarization state despite the anticipated benefits in using additional information. For example, the use of a set of two perpendicular polarizers enabled Cherenkov signal subtraction from fluorescence for carbon ion irradiation 17 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Direct in-water radiation dose measurements using Cherenkov emission corrected signals from polarization imaging for a clinical radiotherapy application

Cloutier

Beaulieu

Archambault

2022

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cherenkov emission (CE) is a visible blueish light emitted in water mediums irradiated by most radiotherapy treatment beams. However, CE is produced anisotropically which currently imposes a geometrical constraint uncertainty for dose measurements. In this work, polarization imaging is proposed and described as a method enabling precise 2D dose measurements using CE. CE produced in a water tank is imaged from four polarization angles using a camera coupled to a rotating polarizer. Using Malus’ law, the polarized component of CE is isolated and corrected with Monte Carlo calculated CE polar and azimuthal angular distributions. Projected dose measurements resulting from polarization-corrected CE are compared to equivalent radiochromic film measurements. Overall, agreement between polarized corrected CE signal and films measurements is found to be within 3%, for projected percent depth dose (PPDD) and profiles at the different tested energies ($$\gamma$$ γ : 6 and $$18\,\hbox {MV}$$ 18 MV , e$$^{-}$$ - : 6 and 18$$\,\hbox {MeV}$$ MeV ). In comparison, raw Cherenkov emission presented deviations up 60% for electron beam PPDDs and 20% for photon beams PPDDs. Finally, a degree of linear polarization between 29% and 47% was measured for CE in comparison to $$0.2\pm 0.3$$ 0.2 ± 0.3 % for scintillation. Hence, polarization imaging is found to be a promising and powerful method for improved radio-luminescent dose measurements with possible extensions to signal separation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Direct in-water radiation dose measurements using Cherenkov emission corrected signals from polarization imaging for a clinical radiotherapy application

Cloutier

Beaulieu

Archambault

2022

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These procedures were basically identical to those previously used for the luminescence imaging of water. 9,[12][13][14][15][16] The actual physical size in the images was 1.0 mm/pixel. The width of the profiles in the measured images was 20 mm.…”

Section: Image Processingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technical note: Correcting angular dependencies using non‐polarized components of Cherenkov light in water during high‐energy X‐ray irradiation

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Dose distribution measurements of high‐energy X‐rays from medical linear accelerators (LINAC) in water are important for quality control (QC) of the system. Although Cherenkov‐light imaging is a useful method for measuring the high‐energy X‐ray dose distribution, depth profiles have an underestimated dose at increased depths due to the angular dependency of the Cherenkov light generated in water. In this study, we use a linear polarizer to separate the majority of polarized components from the majority of unpolarized components of Cherenkov‐light images in water and then use this information to correct for angular dependencies. Methods A water phantom, a cooled charge‐coupled device (CCD) camera, and a polarizer were installed in a black box. Then, the water phantom was irradiated from the upper side with 6 or 10 MV X‐rays, and the Cherenkov light generated in water was imaged with the polarizer axis at both parallel and perpendicular orientations to the beam. By using these images from the two orientations relative to the beam, we corrected the angular dependency of the Cherenkov light. Results By subtracting the images measured with the polarizer perpendicular to the beams from the images measured with the polarizer parallel to the beams, we could obtain images with only the polarized components. Using these images, we could calculate the images with non‐polarized components that had similar depth profiles to those calculated with a planning system. The average difference between corrected depth profiles and those calculated with the planning system was less than 1%, while that between uncorrected depth profiles and the planning system was more than 8.3% in depths of water from 20 to 100 mm. Conclusion We conclude that the use of the polarizer has the potential to improve the accuracy of dose distribution in Cherenkov‐light imaging of water using high‐energy X‐rays.

show abstract

“…A recent work has investigated Cherenkov signal subtraction from fluorescence using a set of two perpendicular polarizers, in the context of carbon ion irradiation. 13 As Cherenkov radiation polarization vector is related to the Cherenkov emission cone and thus its direction, 14 our work explores the underlying potential of polarization imaging to resolve the Cherenkov signal anisotropy and achieve direct inwater dose measurements. This letter presents a novel and innovative approach that measures polarization state and angle in order to accurately measure dose based on the Cherenkov signal at any depth or position in a water tank.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cherenkov emission spectra and intensity are currently well characterized in the context of dose measurements, but little work has been done regarding using its polarization state. A recent work has investigated Cherenkov signal subtraction from fluorescence using a set of two perpendicular polarizers, in the context of carbon ion irradiation 13 . As Cherenkov radiation polarization vector is related to the Cherenkov emission cone and thus its direction, 14 our work explores the underlying potential of polarization imaging to resolve the Cherenkov signal anisotropy and achieve direct in‐water dose measurements.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accurate dose measurements using Cherenkov emission polarization imaging

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Cherenkov radiation carries the potential of direct in‐water dose measurements, but its precision is currently limited by a strong anisotropy. Taking advantage of polarization imaging, this work proposes a new approach for high‐accuracy Cherenkov emission dose measurements. Methods Cherenkov radiation produced in a 15 × 15 × 20‐cm3 water tank is imaged with a cooled charge‐coupled device (CCD) camera from four polarizer transmission axes [0, 45, 90, 135°]. The water tank is positioned at the isocenter of a 5 × 5‐cm2, 6‐, and 18‐MV photon beam. Using Malus’ law, the polarized portion of the signal is extracted. Corrections are applied to the polarized signal following azimuthal and polar Cherenkov emission angular distributions extracted from Monte Carlo simulations. Projected percent depth dose and beam profiles are measured and compared with the prediction from a treatment planning system (TPS). Results Corrected polarized signals on the central axis reduced deviations at depth (mean ± standard deviation) from 8% ± 5% to 0.8% ± 1% at 6 MV and 8% ± 7% to 1% ± 3% at 18 MV. For the profile measurement, differences between the corrected polarized signal and the TPS calculations are 1% ± 3% and 2% ± 3% on the central axis at 6 and 18 MV respectively. In these conditions, Cherenkov emission is shown to be partly polarized. Conclusions This work proposes a novel polarization imaging approach enabling high‐precision water‐based dose measurements using the Cherenkov radiation. The method allows a correction of the Cherenkov emission anisotropy within 4% on the beam central axis and in depth.

show abstract

Imaging of polarized components of Cerenkov light and luminescence of water during carbon‐ion irradiation

Cited by 4 publications

References 16 publications

Direct in-water radiation dose measurements using Cherenkov emission corrected signals from polarization imaging for a clinical radiotherapy application

Direct in-water radiation dose measurements using Cherenkov emission corrected signals from polarization imaging for a clinical radiotherapy application

Technical note: Correcting angular dependencies using non‐polarized components of Cherenkov light in water during high‐energy X‐ray irradiation

Accurate dose measurements using Cherenkov emission polarization imaging

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About