Abstract:Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) disease is considered a standout manifestation of coronary artery disease (CAD), because it is accompanied by the highest mortality. Increased mortality is expected, because LMCA is responsible for supplying up to 80% of total blood flow to the left ventricle in a right-dominant coronary system. Due to the significant progress of biomedical technology, the modern drug-eluting stents have remarkably improved the prognosis of patients with LMCA disease treated invasively. In fact… Show more
“…A plethora of studies have substantiated the clinical significance of IVUS-guided PCI in enhancing short-, mid-, and long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes [32][33][34]. Against this background, Hannan et al observed a progressive escalation in the utilization of IVUS-guided PCI among patients presenting complex vascular lesions, surging from 13.4% in 2014 to 16.5% in 2018 within New York-based healthcare facilities [35]. These observations align with those made by Mentias et al, who reported a discernible uptick in the utilization of IVUS performance in the context of PCI, which rose from 3.0% in 2009 to 6.9% in 2016 within the United States.…”
The optimal duration of DAPT after complex PCI remains under investigation. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the safety and efficacy of a one-month therapy period versus a longer duration of DAPT after complex PCI. We systematically screened three major databases, searching for randomized controlled trials or sub-analyses of them, which compared shortened DAPT (S-DAPT), namely, one month, and longer DAPT (L-DAPT), namely, more than three months. The primary endpoint was any Net Adverse Clinical Event (NACE), and the secondary was any MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Event), its components (mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and stent thrombosis), and major bleeding events. Three studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 6275 patients. Shortening DAPT to 30 days after complex PCI did not increase the risk of NACEs (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.52–1.14), MACEs, mortality, myocardial infractions, stroke, or stent thrombosis. Pooled major bleeding incidence was reduced, but this finding was not statistically significant. This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that one-month DAPT did not differ compared to a longer duration of DAPT after complex PCI in terms of safety and efficacy endpoints. Further studies are still required to confirm these findings.
“…A plethora of studies have substantiated the clinical significance of IVUS-guided PCI in enhancing short-, mid-, and long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes [32][33][34]. Against this background, Hannan et al observed a progressive escalation in the utilization of IVUS-guided PCI among patients presenting complex vascular lesions, surging from 13.4% in 2014 to 16.5% in 2018 within New York-based healthcare facilities [35]. These observations align with those made by Mentias et al, who reported a discernible uptick in the utilization of IVUS performance in the context of PCI, which rose from 3.0% in 2009 to 6.9% in 2016 within the United States.…”
The optimal duration of DAPT after complex PCI remains under investigation. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the safety and efficacy of a one-month therapy period versus a longer duration of DAPT after complex PCI. We systematically screened three major databases, searching for randomized controlled trials or sub-analyses of them, which compared shortened DAPT (S-DAPT), namely, one month, and longer DAPT (L-DAPT), namely, more than three months. The primary endpoint was any Net Adverse Clinical Event (NACE), and the secondary was any MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Event), its components (mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and stent thrombosis), and major bleeding events. Three studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 6275 patients. Shortening DAPT to 30 days after complex PCI did not increase the risk of NACEs (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.52–1.14), MACEs, mortality, myocardial infractions, stroke, or stent thrombosis. Pooled major bleeding incidence was reduced, but this finding was not statistically significant. This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that one-month DAPT did not differ compared to a longer duration of DAPT after complex PCI in terms of safety and efficacy endpoints. Further studies are still required to confirm these findings.
“…Subanalyses of the existing meta-analyses did not discover any difference between these two time frames’ regimens [ 32 ]. However, stents’ evolution, intravascular imaging progress and interventional techniques’ development will reduce further ischemic complications (MI, stent thrombosis and revascularization) and trials studying 30- with 90-days DAPT will try to resolve this dilemma [ 45 , 46 ].…”
Abbreviation of the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (one or three months) has been recently proposed, especially for high bleeding risk patients, after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES). Three databases were screened for eligible randomized control trials. The primary endpoint was the incidence of net adverse clinical events (NACE). Secondary endpoints consisted of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent-thrombosis, repeat revascularization and major bleeding. We included four RCTs with a total of 26,576 patients; 13,282 patients were grouped in 30-days DAPT, while the remaining 13,294 were allocated in a longer period of DAPT. One month of DAPT did not significantly reduce NACE (odds ratio [OR]: 0.87, 95% confidence intervals [Cl]: 0.74–1.03); however, major bleedings were significantly reduced by 22% (OR: 0.78, 95% Cl: 0.65–0.94). Mortality or ischemic events (stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularization and stent thrombosis) were not affected. Thus, 30-days DAPT could be considered as safe and feasible after PCI with DES in selected patients, especially those with high bleeding risk. Forthcoming RCTs could shed light on the optimal duration of DAPT.
“…Moreover, the progress of interventional techniques, invasive imaging, and the development of novel drug-eluted balloons and biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents could decrease the risk of ischemic events in patients with diabetes. 21,[27][28][29] Whether patients with diabetes having undergone PCI are under higher risk of major bleeding, compared with nondiabetic remains controversial. Although optimal glycemic control may have a cardioprotective role during acute phase of ACS, it was not associated with a reduced incidence of major bleedings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the progress of interventional techniques, invasive imaging, and the development of novel drug-eluted balloons and biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents could decrease the risk of ischemic events in patients with diabetes. 21,27–29…”
Aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare shortened (≤3 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with longer DAPT in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).
We systematically screened three major databases (Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus) searching for randomized-controlled trials or sub-analyses of them, which compared shortened (S-DAPT) to longer (L-DAPT) regimens of DAPT. Primary endpoint of systematic review and meta-analysis is the NACE (Net Adverse Cardiac Events) and secondary are MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Events), mortality, bleedings, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis. Subgroup analyses included studies using only ticagrelor-based regimens and three-months duration of DAPT.
A total of eight studies and 12,665 patients were included in our analysis. Our meta-analysis met its primary endpoint, as S-DAPT was associated significantly with a reduced risk ratio (RR) by 17% [RR: 0.83, 95% Confidence Intervals (CI): 0.72-0.96]. Non-significant difference among the rest endpoints was detected between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed that ticagrelor-based regimens were associated with a significant reduction of mortality (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.93) and three-months DAPT reduced furtherly NACE by 27% (RR:0.73, 95% CI: 0.60-0.89).
In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis showed that (i) S-DAPT was significantly associated with a lower incidence of NACE, (ii) ticagrelor-based S-DAPT was associated with decreased mortality rates, and (iii) the benefit of three-months duration of DAPT achieved an even greater NACE reduction. Thus, S-DAPT could be considered as a safe and feasible option in diabetic patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.