2021
DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging of Head and Neck Cancer With CT, MRI, and US

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Head and neck MRI serves as the most commonly used auxiliary examination for diagnosing tumors and other lesions in the maxillofacial region 1 5 . To investigate the possible artifacts produced by oral prosthesis in MRI, we included commonly-used crowns with nine different materials and titanium implants to compare the susceptibility artifacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Head and neck MRI serves as the most commonly used auxiliary examination for diagnosing tumors and other lesions in the maxillofacial region 1 5 . To investigate the possible artifacts produced by oral prosthesis in MRI, we included commonly-used crowns with nine different materials and titanium implants to compare the susceptibility artifacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and neck is widely used to diagnose tumours and other lesions in the oral cavity, temporomandibular joint and salivary gland 1 5 . However, susceptibility artifacts, also referred to as metal artifacts, are caused by differences in susceptibility between a prosthesis and the adjacent tissue, thereby inducing inhomogeneity in a magnetic field 6 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI provides superior contrast resolution and is often able to better delineate infiltrating tumour margins from surrounding tissue. As a result, MRI may be useful for detection of small oropharyngeal tumours in patients with p16+ nodal disease (Junn et al, 2021). In a meta-analysis of 63 studies comparing CT vs MRI for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer, CT scan was found to have higher sensitivity (77% vs 72%), but lower specificity (72% vs 81%) as compared to MRI (Sun et al, 2015).…”
Section: T/mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound imaging and fluorescence imaging technology, were used to diagnose the tumor, which can represent an integrated tissue property with a certain dimension or a cross-sectional slice and depict the inner structure [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%