2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11916-019-0741-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging of Carotid Dissection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
42
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the sudden onset of neck pain, the possibility of a vascular dissection should be considered, and we thought vertebral artery dissection was the most possible diagnosis when she was transferred. MRI is also good diagnostic tool for vascular disease [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the sudden onset of neck pain, the possibility of a vascular dissection should be considered, and we thought vertebral artery dissection was the most possible diagnosis when she was transferred. MRI is also good diagnostic tool for vascular disease [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not suitable for application in all patients. Instead, CTA and MRA are considered non-invasive imaging approaches to detect CAD and can be used in most patients [12,13,30]. Unfortunately, these modalities of angiography are not able to detect intramural hematoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of CAD, ICAD, or VAD was confirmed by two stroke neurologists and a neuroradiologist based on clinical manifestations and radiological features of the cases. Both cervical artery dissection and intracranial artery dissection were included in the analysis if patients presented with an intramural hematoma, intimal flap, double lumen, long tapering stenosis, artery occlusion that recanalizes in an irregular aneurysmal dilation or stenosis, or irregular aneurysmal dilation with rapid changes in morphology or associated with focal stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging and angiography (MRI, MRA), or computed tomography angiography (CTA), or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) [9,12,13]. Patients were excluded if they had co-occurrence of CAD and VAD, or if they had dissection for iatrogenic causes, or if dissection or injury of other supra-aortic arteries were identified, including aortic dissection.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the speed of image acquisition is slow and MRA is not always feasible in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Conversely, CTA is widely available, offers rapid image acquisition and compares favorably with DSA at a sensitivity of 64–100% and specificity of 67–100% [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%