The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging Jupiter’s radiation belts down to 127 MHz with LOFAR

Abstract: Context. With the limited amount of in situ particle data available for the innermost region of Jupiter's magnetosphere, Earth-based observations of the giant planets synchrotron emission remain the sole method today of scrutinizing the distribution and dynamical behavior of the ultra energetic electrons magnetically trapped around the planet. Radio observations ultimately provide key information about the origin and control parameters of the harsh radiation environment. Aims. We perform the first resolved and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrons trapped within the radiation belts of Jupiter produce synchrotron emissions that are observable from Earth in the radio frequencies (see Girard et al [] for an introduction to the Jovian synchrotron emission). The resolved observations help to constrain the models of the Jovian electron belts inside 4 R J , where the in situ measurements are limited (see Girard et al [] for a review on physical models improvements with synchrotron radiation and Garrett et al [] for an example of an empirical model improvement).…”
Section: Validation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electrons trapped within the radiation belts of Jupiter produce synchrotron emissions that are observable from Earth in the radio frequencies (see Girard et al [] for an introduction to the Jovian synchrotron emission). The resolved observations help to constrain the models of the Jovian electron belts inside 4 R J , where the in situ measurements are limited (see Girard et al [] for a review on physical models improvements with synchrotron radiation and Garrett et al [] for an example of an empirical model improvement).…”
Section: Validation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Sicard‐Piet et al [] proposed the hybrid JOSE (JOvian Specification Environment) model that relies on Salammbô where the McIlwain parameter, L , is lower than 9.5 and is based on the measurements gathered by the Galileo mission otherwise. Physical models have also demonstrated their ability to reproduce the synchrotron radiation observations [ de Pater and Goertz , ; Santos‐Costa et al, ; Sicard and Bourdarie , ; Santos‐Costa and Bolton , ; Girard et al, ], as some empirical models do [ Levin et al, ; Garrett et al, ; Adumitroaie et al, ], and study their time evolutions [ de Pater and Goertz , ; Sicard et al, ; Santos‐Costa et al, ; Kita et al, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to imaging, various types of sporadic radio emission are studied: pulsars (Coenen et al, 2014;Stovall et al, 2015;Kondratiev et al, 2016) including giant pulses (Tsai et al, 2016), Jupiter (Girard et al, 2016), the Sun (Morosan et al, 2015) and other transient signals (Stappers et al, 2011;Rowlinson et al, 2016). These results show the vast capabilities o®ered by digital receivers at standalone radio telescopes (Kocz et al, 2015) as well as in multi-telescope observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the basic physics of synchrotron emission pinned down, a challenge in recent years was to deduce the spatial and energy distribution of electrons to allow to best reproduction of the observed 2-D and 3-D maps of radio emission (Santos-Costa & Bolton, 2008;Girard et al, 2016). This has been achieved with synthetic 2-D radio maps that have excellent agreement with radio observations (Santos-Costa & Bourdarie, 2001;Sicard & Bourdarie, 2004;Nènon et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%