2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging in pediatric bilateral sensorineural hearing loss: Diagnostic yield with computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a multicenter study evaluating the diagnostic yield of CT versus MRI in children with profound bilateral hearing loss, the concordance rate between CT and MRI was 92%, with the diagnostic yield of CT being 7% higher than that of MRI ( p = 0.0001). 125 In another study with a similar design comparing diagnostic yield between CT and MRI, the concordance rate between them was 86%, with MRI having a 14% higher yield for detecting diagnostic findings in children with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. 126 …”
Section: Evidence-based Evaluation and Diagnosis Of Hearing Loss In C...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In a multicenter study evaluating the diagnostic yield of CT versus MRI in children with profound bilateral hearing loss, the concordance rate between CT and MRI was 92%, with the diagnostic yield of CT being 7% higher than that of MRI ( p = 0.0001). 125 In another study with a similar design comparing diagnostic yield between CT and MRI, the concordance rate between them was 86%, with MRI having a 14% higher yield for detecting diagnostic findings in children with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. 126 …”
Section: Evidence-based Evaluation and Diagnosis Of Hearing Loss In C...mentioning
confidence: 94%