2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11926-020-00955-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging for Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Outcome Prediction of Large Vessel Vasculitides

Abstract: Purpose of Review To discuss and summarize the latest evidence on imaging techniques in giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK). This is a report on the performance of ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18-FDG-PET), and other emerging imaging techniques in diagnosis, outcome prediction, and monitoring of disease activity. Recent Findings Imaging techniques have gained an important role for diagnosis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These criteria have been of great help in the identification of patients with the classic cranial symptoms of GCA and, therefore, temporal artery biopsy has been considered, for many years, as the gold standard in confirming the diagnosis of GCA [3]. However, ultrasound (US) of the temporal arteries has emerged as an alternative method to detect inflammatory changes in the vessel wall without the need for biopsy [7][8][9]. In this sense, this imaging technique has progressively gained the support of physicians for use in the early diagnosis of GCA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These criteria have been of great help in the identification of patients with the classic cranial symptoms of GCA and, therefore, temporal artery biopsy has been considered, for many years, as the gold standard in confirming the diagnosis of GCA [3]. However, ultrasound (US) of the temporal arteries has emerged as an alternative method to detect inflammatory changes in the vessel wall without the need for biopsy [7][8][9]. In this sense, this imaging technique has progressively gained the support of physicians for use in the early diagnosis of GCA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the advent of other imaging techniques has made it possible to identify the presence of inflammatory vasculitic changes in the aorta and other extracranial vessels of patients with GCA [10][11][12][13][14]. Imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, and US have been shown to be essential for identifying a subset of patients who present with extracranial involvement without the classic pattern of cranial manifestations of GCA [8,9,15]. Extracranial LVV-GCA often presents with non-specific manifestations, such as refractory polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and constitutional symptoms [10,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is patient-friendly, reproducible, and repeatable. It can be used in fast-track clinics offering appointments for patients within 24 h, to rapidly confirm or exclude the diagnosis of suspected GCA [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing a suitable vessel model and finding the perfect gelatine did take us a total of 12 months, as we struggled with different materials and 3D printers. However, we were finally able to 3D print a standardized artery model of the axillary and temporal artery, with either normal or pathological IMT changes fulfilling the OMERACT definitions [ 5 ] and displaying typical IMT changes [ 23 ]. When we tested the four models on two experienced sonographers in vascular ultrasound in GCA, the intra-class coefficient of normal and pathological temporal and axillary arteries in GCA were excellent for the diagnosis of GCA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination is mandatory to rule out a brain pathology that causes symptoms such as headache or sudden visual loss ( Fig. 6 ) ( 21 , 22 ).…”
Section: Positive Diagnosis In Gcamentioning
confidence: 99%