“…Two SBRT studies reporting the results of the same phase 2 trial complemented each other, and were counted as 1 study. One phase 3 study comparing SBRT and surgery (only the SBRT data was used) [12], 10 phase 2 [20-31], 1 phase 1 [32], and 56 retrospective [33-51,53-89] photon SBRT studies were included in the survival outcome comparison analysis. Among them, treatment-related toxicities were reported in all the prospective studies [12,20-32], and 40 retrospective studies [34,37,39-40,42,44-47,49,52-61,65,67-73,76-78, 80-82,84-89].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 1 retrospective study without toxicity reporting, a similar retrospective study reporting on patients from the same institution treated in the same fashion and in similar time periods was used in the toxicity analysis [51,52]. Patterns of failure were analyzed based on the information provided in 57 studies, which included 1 phase 3 (only the SBRT data was used), 10 phase 2, 0 phase 1, and 46 retrospective studies [12,20-31,34-46,48-51,54-57,59-65,68-71,73-75,77-79,82,84-90]. Among them, 1 retrospective study was not included in the survival outcome or toxicity profile analysis [90].…”
Purpose
To assess hypo-fractionated particle beam therapy (PBT)'s efficacy relative to that of photon stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods
Eligible studies were identified through extensive searches of the PubMed, Medline, Google-scholar, and Cochrane library databases from 2000 to 2016. Original English publications of ES NSCLC were included. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the survival outcome, toxicity profile, and patterns of failure following each treatment.
Results
72 SBRT studies and 9 hypo-fractionated PBT studies (mostly single-arm) were included. PBT was associated with improved overall survival (OS; p = 0.005) and progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.01) in the univariate meta-analysis. The OS benefit did not reach its statistical significance after inclusion of operability into the final multivariate meta-analysis (p = 0.11); while the 3-year local control (LC) still favored PBT (p = 0.03).
Conclusion
Although hypo-fractionated PBT may lead to additional clinical benefit when compared with photon SBRT, no statistically significant survival benefit from PBT over SBRT was observed in the treatment of ES NSCLC in this hypothesis-generating meta-analysis after adjusting for potential confounding variables.
“…Two SBRT studies reporting the results of the same phase 2 trial complemented each other, and were counted as 1 study. One phase 3 study comparing SBRT and surgery (only the SBRT data was used) [12], 10 phase 2 [20-31], 1 phase 1 [32], and 56 retrospective [33-51,53-89] photon SBRT studies were included in the survival outcome comparison analysis. Among them, treatment-related toxicities were reported in all the prospective studies [12,20-32], and 40 retrospective studies [34,37,39-40,42,44-47,49,52-61,65,67-73,76-78, 80-82,84-89].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 1 retrospective study without toxicity reporting, a similar retrospective study reporting on patients from the same institution treated in the same fashion and in similar time periods was used in the toxicity analysis [51,52]. Patterns of failure were analyzed based on the information provided in 57 studies, which included 1 phase 3 (only the SBRT data was used), 10 phase 2, 0 phase 1, and 46 retrospective studies [12,20-31,34-46,48-51,54-57,59-65,68-71,73-75,77-79,82,84-90]. Among them, 1 retrospective study was not included in the survival outcome or toxicity profile analysis [90].…”
Purpose
To assess hypo-fractionated particle beam therapy (PBT)'s efficacy relative to that of photon stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods
Eligible studies were identified through extensive searches of the PubMed, Medline, Google-scholar, and Cochrane library databases from 2000 to 2016. Original English publications of ES NSCLC were included. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the survival outcome, toxicity profile, and patterns of failure following each treatment.
Results
72 SBRT studies and 9 hypo-fractionated PBT studies (mostly single-arm) were included. PBT was associated with improved overall survival (OS; p = 0.005) and progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.01) in the univariate meta-analysis. The OS benefit did not reach its statistical significance after inclusion of operability into the final multivariate meta-analysis (p = 0.11); while the 3-year local control (LC) still favored PBT (p = 0.03).
Conclusion
Although hypo-fractionated PBT may lead to additional clinical benefit when compared with photon SBRT, no statistically significant survival benefit from PBT over SBRT was observed in the treatment of ES NSCLC in this hypothesis-generating meta-analysis after adjusting for potential confounding variables.
“…The impact of the pretreatment maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) on FDG-PET has been reported by some studies (23)(24)(25)(26), although it is controversial. Shultz et al (27) identified imaging-based biomarkers (tumor size, contact with the mediastinal pleura, and SUVmax) and found them to be associated with distant progression. In the current study, it was found that mGPS had a correlation with increased DM.…”
“…While our findings are consistent with the conclusions of a recent meta-analysis that included patients undergoing any form of lung radiotherapy,[30] a definitive association between pre-treatment SUV max and LR specifically in patients undergoing SBRT, a radiotherapy technique with a low rate of LR, has not yet been demonstrated. Several prior studies limited to SBRT patients have not found an association between SUV max and LR [24-26, 28, 31]. Other small retrospective studies have provided some evidence for an association between SUV max and LR, yet interpretability has been limited by a low number of LR events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with LR, no consensus exists regarding the association between pre-SBRT SUV max and DM. Multiple prior reports have failed to link SUV max to a higher risk of DM in the setting of SBRT for early-stage NSCLC [22, 26, 28, 31, 34]. Other studies have reported such an association, but differences in study design have limited their interpretation.…”
Objectives
Glucose metabolic activity measured by [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has shown prognostic value in multiple malignancies, but results are often confounded by the inclusion of patients with various disease stages and undergoing various therapies. This study was designed to evaluate the prognostic value of tumor FDG uptake quantified by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in a large group of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using consistent treatment techniques.
Materials and Methods
219 lesions in 211 patients treated with definitive SBRT for stage I NSCLC were analyzed after a median follow-up of 25.2 months. Cox regression was used to determine associations between SUVmax and overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and freedom from local recurrence (FFLR) or distant metastasis (FFDM).
Results
SUVmax >3.0 was associated with worse OS (p<0.001), FFLR (p=0.003) and FFDM (p=0.003). On multivariate analysis, OS was associated with SUVmax (HR 1.89, p=0.03), gross tumor volume (GTV) (HR 1.94, p=0.005) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (HR 0.51, p=0.008). DSS was associated only with SUVmax (HR 2.58, p=0.04). Both LR (HR 11.47, p=0.02) and DM (HR 3.75, p=0.006) were also associated with higher SUVmax.
Conclusion
In a large patient population, SUVmax >3.0 was associated with worse survival and a greater propensity for local recurrence and distant metastasis after SBRT for NSCLC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.