Imaging faults and fractures with the difference of fast and slow shear-wave splitting reflectivity, Δγ^(S): 3D/9C survey in Midland Basin, West Texas, and 3D/3C survey in Washakie Basin, Wyoming

Abstract

One of the most important applications of shear-wave (S-wave) seismic exploration has been in reservoir fracture characterization. While many advancements have been made over the past 30 years to compute and correct for the long-wavelength kinematics of S-wave splitting (SWS) (fast S-wave polarization directions and slow S-wave time delays), practically no progress has been made in imaging the short-wavelength reflectivity of fractures directly with Δγ(S). This property is the contrast in the SWS anisotropy parameter, γ(S), and represents the reflection amplitude at vertical incidence for changes in fracture density and orientation across an interface. In this article, we examine the Lupin nine-component survey in Midland Basin, Texas, for the technical reliability of imaging fractures in depth with converted P to S waves (PS waves) guided by pure-mode horizontal shear waves and vertical shear waves. Final Δγ(S) amplitude maps for each mode show sensitivity to fractures, faults, and the maximum horizontal stress direction. These maps are computed from the difference between fast and slow S-wave stacks (after SWS analysis and correction) and P-wave amplitude variation with offset gradient stacks. The S-wave difference maps identify an east–west lineament, possibly a strike-slip fault or fracture corridor, that is not observed by P-wave depth slices. Pure-mode S waves and PS waves are orders of magnitude more sensitive to Δγ(S) than P waves. We also review the development of Δγ(S) and find that it has been relatively unexploited by the exploration industry. In addition, we demonstrate that Δγ(S) can be obtained directly from the objective function of the transverse energy to correct for SWS, and show a four-component Alford rotation example from a previous PS-wave survey in the Washakie Basin, Wyoming.