Imaging Evaluation of Maternal Complications Associated with Repeat Cesarean Deliveries

Moshiri, Mariam; Osman, Sherif; Bhargava, Puneet; Maximin, Suresh; Robinson, Tracy J.; Katz, Douglas S.

doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2014.05.010

Cited by 13 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 77 publications

(97 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fortunately, uterine rupture is rare, occurring in 1 in 5700 to 20,000 pregnancies . Usually occurring in the setting of trauma or dehiscence of a cesarean section scar, uterine rupture carries a high mortality for both the patient and fetus . US is considered the primary imaging modality.…”

Section: Indications For Mri In Pregnancymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…51,52 Usually occurring in the setting of trauma or dehiscence of a cesarean section scar, uterine rupture carries a high mortality for both the patient and fetus. 53,54 US is considered the primary imaging modality. However, MRI can offer improved visualization of the uterine wall in equivocal US cases where the patient is clinically stable.…”

Section: Indications For Mri In Pregnancymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

MRI in pregnancy: Indications and practical considerations

Mervak

Altun

McGinty

et al. 2019

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a constantly evolving knowledgebase regarding the safety of MRI in pregnant patients, as well as the safety of gadolinium administration, given potential fetal risks. This review provides an overview of national and international recommendations for patient screening and safety by trimester, evaluates the most recent literature regarding administration of gadolinium in pregnant patients, and discusses technical requirements when imaging pregnant patients. A protocol for imaging pregnant patients is provided, and multiple common indications for MRI in pregnancy are discussed. Level of Evidence 5. Technical Efficacy Stage 5. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:621–631.

show abstract

Section: Indications For Mri In Pregnancymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Indications For Mri In Pregnancymentioning

confidence: 99%

MRI in pregnancy: Indications and practical considerations

Mervak

Altun

McGinty

et al. 2019

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…) . In cases of partial dehiscence, it is essential to measure the minimum wall thickness at the site of the dehiscence, as patients with a minimum wall thickness of <2.5 mm require surgical repair …”

Section: Acute Gynecologic Conditions Related To Pregnancymentioning

confidence: 99%

MRI of Acute Gynecologic Conditions

Gunther

Kanmaniraja

Kobi

et al. 2019

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Besides, scar defect was not studied by appropriate and available methods in non-pregnant women before the following pregnancies. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Second, the outcomes of peritoneum closure or non-closure are associated with postsurgical made on the impact of the diff erent techniques on these outcomes. Our view is different.…”

Section: The Coronis Trial On Caesarean Sectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In our opinion, there are still some unresolved issues concerning caesarean section technique behind the CORONIS trial. That is why laparoscopy, 2 hysteroscopy, 3 hysterosalpingography, 4 ultrasound, 5,6 and modern visualisation technologies 7 should be applied for precise assessment of the scar defect in the lower uterine segment in individuals who have previously undergone caesarean section.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%