2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging buried Quaternary valleys using the transient electromagnetic method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(30 reference statements)
4
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly true for data collected by airborne electromagnetic methods (AEM) because they can be collected quickly, densely, and at a relatively low cost for the very large spatial coverage (Steuer et al, 2008;Viezzoli et al, 2010b;Abraham et al, 2012;Faneca Sànchez et al, 2012;Refsgaard et al, 2014;Munday et al, 2015). Large-scale AEM (or ground-based EM) investigations have been used to delineate aquifers, aquitards, and buried valleys or other structures containing aquifers Jørgensen et al, 2003;Abraham et al, 2012;Oldenborger et al, 2013), to assess aquifer vulnerability Foged et al, 2014), to map saltwater intrusion (Fitterman and Deszcz-Pan, 1998;Viezzoli et al, 2010b;Lawrie et al, 2012;Herckenrath et al, 2013b), and to map freshwater resources (Steuer et al, 2008;Faneca Sànchez et al, 2012;Munday et al, 2015). The main drawbacks of electromagnetic (EM) data are (1) ambiguity in relating electrical properties to hydraulic properties, and (2) reduced lateral and vertical resolution with depth.…”
Section: Informing Hydrologic Models With Geophysicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true for data collected by airborne electromagnetic methods (AEM) because they can be collected quickly, densely, and at a relatively low cost for the very large spatial coverage (Steuer et al, 2008;Viezzoli et al, 2010b;Abraham et al, 2012;Faneca Sànchez et al, 2012;Refsgaard et al, 2014;Munday et al, 2015). Large-scale AEM (or ground-based EM) investigations have been used to delineate aquifers, aquitards, and buried valleys or other structures containing aquifers Jørgensen et al, 2003;Abraham et al, 2012;Oldenborger et al, 2013), to assess aquifer vulnerability Foged et al, 2014), to map saltwater intrusion (Fitterman and Deszcz-Pan, 1998;Viezzoli et al, 2010b;Lawrie et al, 2012;Herckenrath et al, 2013b), and to map freshwater resources (Steuer et al, 2008;Faneca Sànchez et al, 2012;Munday et al, 2015). The main drawbacks of electromagnetic (EM) data are (1) ambiguity in relating electrical properties to hydraulic properties, and (2) reduced lateral and vertical resolution with depth.…”
Section: Informing Hydrologic Models With Geophysicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jorgensen et al (2003b) estimate resistivity thresholds to differentiate between sediments in buried valleys in Denmark. Accordingly, glacial sand has a resistivity greater than 60 m whereas clayey till sediments are placed between 25 and 50 m, and thus the exact cutoff value varies between study sites.…”
Section: Geophysical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study integrates high-resolution airborne geophysical data with borehole data to build a probabilistic classification of the subsurface at site. The geophysical data are collected by SkyTEM, an airborne transient electromagnetic method (TEM) that has been used extensively in Denmark for the purpose of groundwater mapping (Christiansen and Christensen, 2003;Jorgensen et al, 2003b;Sorensen and Auken, 2004;Auken et al, 2009). This study utilizes a method that translates SkyTEM observation data into facies probability, which enables associating the geophysical data with softness according to the level of uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jørgensen et al [9] used the TEM method for 3D imaging of the cross-section of buried Quaternary valleys in Denmark. Their work studied several scenarios representing buried valleys for groundwater exploitation, and the 3D imaging was based also on constrained 1D…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%