2017
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging, Behavior and Endocrine Analysis of “Jealousy” in a Monogamous Primate

Abstract: Understanding the neurobiology of social bonding in non-human primates is a critical step in understanding the evolution of monogamy, as well as understanding the neural substrates for emotion and behavior. Coppery titi monkeys (Callicebus cupreus) form strong pair bonds, characterized by selective preference for their pair mate, mate-guarding, physiological and behavioral agitation upon separation, and social buffering. Mate-guarding, or the “maintenance” phase of pair bonding, is relatively under-studied in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that testosterone secretion in males may be an anticipatory response to guard against reproductive conflict. Titi monkeys, which have a more rigid monogamous mating structure, that viewed their pairmate in close proximity to a sexual rival had higher levels of plasma testosterone compared to conditions when their viewed an opposite-sex stranger next to a sexual rival (Maninger et al, 2017), suggesting that HPG-axis activation is specific to challenges to the established bond. Overall, changes in androgen levels and behavior depend on both social status and group composition in species that engage varying mating strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that testosterone secretion in males may be an anticipatory response to guard against reproductive conflict. Titi monkeys, which have a more rigid monogamous mating structure, that viewed their pairmate in close proximity to a sexual rival had higher levels of plasma testosterone compared to conditions when their viewed an opposite-sex stranger next to a sexual rival (Maninger et al, 2017), suggesting that HPG-axis activation is specific to challenges to the established bond. Overall, changes in androgen levels and behavior depend on both social status and group composition in species that engage varying mating strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the socially monogamous titi monkey, subjects that gazed longer at their pairmate in close proximity to a sexual rival experienced greater HPA-axis activity compared to conditions when they viewed a stranger male-female pair. Further, titi monkeys showed increased neural activity in central areas of the social behavior network with abundant OT receptors (Freeman et al, 2014; Maninger et al, 2017), which indicates that OT activity within these social network hubs may be sensitive and responsive to threats to the established bond. There is burgeoning evidence that the OT system regulates the anxiolytic and stress-reducing effects of social buffering in primates (Cavanaugh et al, 2018, 2016; Crockford et al, 2017; Parker et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monogamous titi monkeys display altered patterns of proximity with their mate in the presence of a stranger [21]. Further, watching their mate interact with a potential sexual rival induces specific patterns of neural activity in male titi monkeys that are not seen when males watch a stranger female interact with a stranger male [22]. The differences observed across social contexts may be driven by changes in behavior from both members of the pair.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social preference for the mate is a key marker of pair bond formation, and in voles is observed after 24 h of cohabitation (Williams et al, 1992), while selective aggression toward conspecifics is considered a marker of pair bond maintenance and is tied to onset of mating with a mate (Carter et al, 1995). While the phases of pair formation and maintenance in prairie voles appear to follow a strict and short timeline, primates tend to show longer and more variable transitions in relationships (Maninger et al, 2017). Patterns of behavior between mates in marmosets shift across time, including levels of sexual behavior (typically, high in the beginning and lower with increased length of pairing) and affiliative social behavior across pairing (typically, lower in the beginning and increasing with pairing length) (Schaffner et al, 1995;Ågmo et al, 2012;c.f.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%