2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c01924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging and Modeling C2 Radical Emissions from Microwave Plasma-Activated Methane/Hydrogen Gas Mixtures: Contributions from Chemiluminescent Reactions and Investigations of Higher-Pressure Effects and Plasma Constriction

Abstract: Wavelength and spatially resolved imaging and 2D plasma chemical modeling methods have been used to study the emission from electronically excited C2 radicals in microwave-activated dilute methane/hydrogen gas mixtures under processing conditions relevant to the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of diamond. Obvious differences in the spatial distributions of the much-studied C2(d3Πg–a3Πu) Swan band emission and the little-studied, higher-energy C2(C1Πg–A1Πu) emission are rationalized by invoking a chemiluminesce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for this (particularly the deduced relation [CHx] ~ (X0(CH4)) 0.5 ) have been detailed previously [51,62]. The rates of fast and critical reactions (39) and (40) are in near balance (Table 2), with the mis-balance (less than 10%) accommodated by the 1 CH2 + H ↔ CH + H2 reaction (which is not of sufficient importance under the present conditions to merit inclusion in Table 2). Similar to {CN}max(p), the calculated pressure dependence {CH}max ≈ 3.4×10 12 ×(p/150) 2.25 cm -2 (with p in Torr, Table 3) is induced by the complex p-dependences of all three terms in the relation…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript Results In a Substantial (~3-fold) Overe...mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reasons for this (particularly the deduced relation [CHx] ~ (X0(CH4)) 0.5 ) have been detailed previously [51,62]. The rates of fast and critical reactions (39) and (40) are in near balance (Table 2), with the mis-balance (less than 10%) accommodated by the 1 CH2 + H ↔ CH + H2 reaction (which is not of sufficient importance under the present conditions to merit inclusion in Table 2). Similar to {CN}max(p), the calculated pressure dependence {CH}max ≈ 3.4×10 12 ×(p/150) 2.25 cm -2 (with p in Torr, Table 3) is induced by the complex p-dependences of all three terms in the relation…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript Results In a Substantial (~3-fold) Overe...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The predicted maximal C2(a 3 Πu) radical column densities, {C2(a),(v=0)}max, included in Table 3 clearly show such a linear dependence on X0(CH4). This can also be expressed via the 2 , which reflect the partitioning between the various C2Hy species as a result of the fast H-shifting reactions [40]. Such relationships are also revealed by the stronger than linear dependence of {C2(a),(v=0)} on pressure p and by its insensitivity to N2 additions, as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript 21mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[ 17,18 ] In addition, in a mixture of gases H 2 + CH 4 , with increasing pressure, the dominant ion in the plasma can change to one that has a significantly higher recombination coefficient and lower mobility. [ 31,32 ] An increase in recombination rate and a decrease in diffusion provide volumetric electron losses. Estimates show that the diffusion loss length due to recombination Da/(αNnormale) $\sqrt{{D}_{a}/(\alpha {N}_{{\rm{e}}})}$, where D a is the diffusion coefficient, α is the recombination coefficient, and N e is the electron concentration, is about 1–2 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%