2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0899-7071(01)00290-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging and localization of pancreatic insulinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…90% of insulinomas are less than 2 cm in diameter. 7 Endoscopic ultrasound scan (EUS) has a blind spot at the splenic hilum which could explain why it was missed on this imaging. Biphasic thin-section helical CT scan and EUS combined has a sensitivity of almost 100% in localising insulinomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…90% of insulinomas are less than 2 cm in diameter. 7 Endoscopic ultrasound scan (EUS) has a blind spot at the splenic hilum which could explain why it was missed on this imaging. Biphasic thin-section helical CT scan and EUS combined has a sensitivity of almost 100% in localising insulinomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In insulinomas, the sensitivity of [ 111 In-DTPA 0 ]-octreotide is below 50% (7) because somatostatin receptor subtype 2 is expressed by less than 60% of insulinomas (8). The conventional imaging methods also have limited sensitivity because of the small size of insulinomas (9,10). The amine precursor 6-18 F-fluoro-Ldopa shows controversial results, with sensitivities ranging from 17% up to 90% (11,12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New techniques, such as spiral CT, with dual phase contrast enhancement, have improved the sensitivity of detection of PETs in humans compared with conventional CT (85 versus 16-72%). 25,29 The introduction of these techniques to veterinary medicine also could improve the accuracy of the identification of canine insulinoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%