2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2004.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging and localization of islet-cell tumours of the pancreas on CT and MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
100
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
100
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Ingestion of water just before the CT scan would act as a negative contrast for visualization of periampullary tumors. An unenhanced scan can initially be performed to look for calcifications, which occur in around 20% of cases, and differentiate this from pancreatic adenocarcinomas, which calcify in only approximately 2% of cases [22] . Thin collimation allows for depiction of submillimeter lesions, and this is usually performed at 1.25 to 2.0 mm section thickness [23] .…”
Section: Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ingestion of water just before the CT scan would act as a negative contrast for visualization of periampullary tumors. An unenhanced scan can initially be performed to look for calcifications, which occur in around 20% of cases, and differentiate this from pancreatic adenocarcinomas, which calcify in only approximately 2% of cases [22] . Thin collimation allows for depiction of submillimeter lesions, and this is usually performed at 1.25 to 2.0 mm section thickness [23] .…”
Section: Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once a clinical and biochemical diagnosis is established, the imaging modalities are used for localization of the tumor. Computed Tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and transabdominal ultrasonography detect approximately 75% of insulinomas (1,4,5). Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy is some-what less sensitive (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although conventional imaging which include CT or MRI scans are usually employed in the initial diagnostic workup, they detect less than 50% of most PNETs that are less than 1 cm, therefore frequently missing small tumors (especially insulinomas, duodenal gastrinomas) and small liver metastases (Noone et al, 2005;Rockall and Reznek, 2007). Although, CT imaging with contrast is perhaps the most common initial imaging obtained, in certain clinical scenarios endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) paired with fine needle aspiration, remains the main endoscopic diagnostic technique.…”
Section: Conventional Imaging and Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy mentioning
confidence: 99%