2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging After GliaSite Brachytherapy: Prognostic MRI Indicators of Disease Control and Recurrence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This limited survival data suggests that this treatment may have been active and is worthy of further study. The median survival was 15.3 months for NEW-GBM patients and 12.8 months for recurrent disease similar to other reports using this device [4, 1619] (Table 1), although well-powered prospective trial has not occurred. Temozolomide chemotherapy, now standard in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma, was not utilized.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This limited survival data suggests that this treatment may have been active and is worthy of further study. The median survival was 15.3 months for NEW-GBM patients and 12.8 months for recurrent disease similar to other reports using this device [4, 1619] (Table 1), although well-powered prospective trial has not occurred. Temozolomide chemotherapy, now standard in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma, was not utilized.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…An analysis of outcome for 20 patients treated with GliaSite brachytherapy for recurrent disease at Johns Hopkins confirmed the observation that imaging changes, including substantially increased contrast enhancement, are not correlated with survival and may therefore represent benign treatment-related effects rather than progressive tumor for some patients [16]. Eighty percent had an imaging confirmed gross total resection, and routine MRIs through 3 months of follow-up were assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In one study, a total of 25 patients with recurrent GBM underwent repeat resection and subsequent GliaSite brachytherapy [66]. After brachytherapy, all patients developed some degree of enhancement around the resection cavity on T1 and T2/FLAIR imaging.…”
Section: Radiation Treatment Effect In Various Radiation Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, those with T1 enhancement under 1 cm before clinical progression had a median survival of 8.4 months (p = 0.004). The subset of patients with T1 enhancement over 1 cm with a concomitant increase in T2 hyperintensity had a median survival of only 10.1 months, suggesting that the development of T1-postcontrast enhancement alone (without T2 hyperintensity) did not necessarily indicate disease progression and may have been an indication of a positive effect of treatment [66]. Clinical trials to optimize the dosing with this device were discontinued as it was felt there was a high rate of early progression.…”
Section: Radiation Treatment Effect In Various Radiation Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Brachytherapy and stereotactic surgical therapies are typically reserved for relapsed GBM and provide some additional survival benefits. [34][35][36] Despite the general avoidance of transarterial embolic treatment in the brain, 90 Y may provide some benefits over EBRT in that it can deliver higher doses of radiation to metastases that exceeds that of EBRT. Furthermore, superselectively delivered TARE may minimize nontarget radiation as the average tissue penetration is 2.4 mm, compared with 3 to 4 cm in brachytherapy or up to the entire cerebral cortex in EBRT.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%