Imagineering Mobility: Constructing Utopias for Future Urban Transport

Abstract

Over the past 50 years a growing body of work has sought to address the problem of planning for transportation in the long term future through scenario-building. Such thinking has generally been restricted to issues concerned with environmental sustainability and the 'images' of future transport so created are usually weak in terms of their social sustainability content, either treating social issues superficially, or ignoring them entirely, or even creating images that are socially undesirable. At the same time, there has generally been a marked decrease over the past 20 years in socially-oriented utopian thinking. As a direct result of these two factors, hardly any consideration has been given recently to imagining socially sustainable views of transport in a future utopia. The key underlying aim of this paper is to provide some background thinking about how this lack might be addressed. To do so, it examines concepts about utopia in terms of their form, content and function, and considers possible reasons for the recent decline in utopian thinking and their 'replacement' by a type of futures-thinking that is referred to as dystopian avoidance. It then examines transport characteristics of utopian thinking in urban planning in the 20 th Century and considers various 'antinomies of transport' with respect to future utopias. Based upon the insights gained, the paper comments on two existing 'practical' sets of transport-related scenarios in terms of their utopian and dystopian characteristics. One particular result is that the utopian aspects of these scenario sets in terms of their social content are relatively weak, in line with the hypothesised recent general decline in (social) utopian thinking. Various conclusions are made which emphasise the usefulness of utopian thinking in transport planning, particularly in participatory approaches. It is suggested that three elements of the transport system should be separately 'utopianised': the mobility of people and goods; physical aspects that facilitate or inhibit such mobility; and the system of governance with respect to formulating and implementing transport policy.

Placing Transport Workers on the Agenda: The Conflicting Logics of Governing Mobility on Bishkek's Marshrutkas

“…The article starts with two simple observations concerning transportation and mobility scholarship. First, transport workers, primarily drivers, are conspicuously absent from the critical mobilities literature (Adey 2010;Cresswell 2006;Hannam et al 2006;Sheller and Urry 2006), and critical urban transport research in particular (Aldred 2012;Docherty and Shaw 2011;Enright 2013;Ke z błowski et al 2016;Timms et al 2014). Second, the literature we find on transport workers, mostly based in empirical settings from the global South (Cervero 2000;Cervero and Golub 2007;Finn and Mulley 2011), remains largely outside recent and ongoing debates in critical urban transport studies.…”

“…) and for paying marginal or no attention to social and political innovations (Timms et al. ). In contrast, the newly emerging critical circuit attempts to introduce more structural and political‐economic analysis.…”

“…They explore regulatory frameworks, divergent logics and discourses of governing mobility and citizens’ capacities to shape transport policy (Aldred ; Docherty and Shaw ; Enright ; Timms et al. ).…”

“…The sustainability circuit has broadened this discussion by counterweighing economic goals with environmental concerns and introducing questions of governance and social justice. However, this literature is also criticised for its tendency to offer technocratic recipes (Ke z błowski et al 2014), for relying on thin and superficial deployment of citizen participation (Ke z błowski et al 2016) and for paying marginal or no attention to social and political innovations (Timms et al 2014). In contrast, the newly emerging critical circuit attempts to introduce more structural and political-economic analysis.…”

“…; Timms et al. ). Second, the literature we find on transport workers, mostly based in empirical settings from the global South (Cervero ; Cervero and Golub ; Finn and Mulley ), remains largely outside recent and ongoing debates in critical urban transport studies.…”