2001
DOI: 10.1177/14634990122228809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imagined Communities reconsidered

Abstract: This article critically evaluates Benedict Anderson's Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (1991), arguing that the book's popularity partly derives from its resonance with widespread, deep-seated western notions of language, especially oppositions between print and orality in terms of their relationship to cognition, emotion, history, and nationalism. The article gives reason to reconsider reactions to Anderson's book and argues for a more sustained focus on the relationsh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Wogan's (2001) critique also looks at the issue of language. Anderson (2006) argues that nations need a common language and that print culture can be instrumental in the creation of "monoglot mass reading publics" (p. 42).…”
Section: Scholarship From "Kahiki"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Wogan's (2001) critique also looks at the issue of language. Anderson (2006) argues that nations need a common language and that print culture can be instrumental in the creation of "monoglot mass reading publics" (p. 42).…”
Section: Scholarship From "Kahiki"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While helpful, however, his work is also a bit problematic. In his reflections on Anderson's book, anthropologist Peter Wogan (2001) argues that Imagined Communities is "premised on a fundamental opposition between print and orality… print is associated with cognition, universalism, monolingualism, and permanent memory, whereas orality is paired up with its opposites: emotion, particularism, multilingualism, and transience" (p. 404). These assumptions about orality and literacy are, according to critics, quite Eurocentric in that they imply that print enables groups of people to conceptualize the nation, whereas orality only inspires emotional attachment to it (p. 405-406).…”
Section: Scholarship From "Kahiki"mentioning
confidence: 99%