2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.99.236808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaginary-Time Formulation of Steady-State Nonequilibrium: Application to Strongly Correlated Transport

Abstract: We extend the imaginary-time formulation of the equilibrium quantum many-body theory to steady-state nonequilibrium with an application to strongly correlated transport. By introducing Matsubara voltage, we keep the finite chemical potential shifts in the Fermi-Dirac function, in agreement with the Keldysh formulation. The formulation is applied to strongly correlated transport in the Kondo regime using the quantum Monte Carlo method.PACS numbers: 73.63. Kv, 72.10.Bg, 72.10.Di A coherent formulation of equi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
154
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
11
154
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hamiltonian approach has been used in combination with the numerical renormalization group (Joura, Freericks, and Pruschke, 2008), and very recently with the exact-diagonalization-based method (Arrigoni, Knap, and von der Linden, 2013;Gramsch et al, 2013). In the case of a steady state, the effective Matsubara method (Han and Heary, 2007) based on Hershfield's expression (Hershfield, 1993) for a steady-state density matrix has been tested as an impurity solver (Aron, Weber, and Kotliar, 2013). In the following, we focus on the diagrammatic approaches, which have been used in various types of applications.…”
Section: General Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Hamiltonian approach has been used in combination with the numerical renormalization group (Joura, Freericks, and Pruschke, 2008), and very recently with the exact-diagonalization-based method (Arrigoni, Knap, and von der Linden, 2013;Gramsch et al, 2013). In the case of a steady state, the effective Matsubara method (Han and Heary, 2007) based on Hershfield's expression (Hershfield, 1993) for a steady-state density matrix has been tested as an impurity solver (Aron, Weber, and Kotliar, 2013). In the following, we focus on the diagrammatic approaches, which have been used in various types of applications.…”
Section: General Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sample the configurations, one usually adopts the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm (Metropolis et al, 1953;Hastings, 1970). One proposes to insert an nth interaction vertex at t n ∈  with probability p prop ðn − 1 → nÞ ¼ jdt n j=ð2t max þ βÞ, or to remove the nth vertex with probability p prop ðn → n − 1Þ ¼ 1=n.…”
Section: B Weak-coupling Ctqmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among several promising steady-state techniques [3], a remarkable leap forward has been recently achieved by Han and Heary who developed a non-equilibrium steadystate impurity solver based on a Matsubara-like formalism and a Hirsch-Fye algorithm (NESS-HF) [4,5]. Progress has also been made in describing the nonequilibrium steady-state dynamics of correlated electrons on finite dimensional lattices [6,7].…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate the practical relevance of the impurity model we introduced, we solve it and compute non-perturbatively the interaction contribution to the retarded self-energies Σ R U by generalizing to multiple leads the steady-state impurity solver that was recently developed by Han and Heary in the context of a two-lead environment [4,13]. Unlike the IPT solver, this solver provides conserving solutions even away from particle-hole symmetry.…”
Section: Green's Functions Through the Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though much is known for quantum impurity systems in equilibrium, understanding their properties in non-equilibrium steady-state is still limited. Nevertheless, significant progress has been made by different approaches, such as (1) analytical approximations: perturbative renormalization group method (RG) 27,28 , Hamiltonian flow equations 29 , functional RG 30,31 , strong-coupling expansions 32 , master equations 33 ; (2) exact analytical solutions: field theory techniques 34 , the scattering Bethe Ansatz 35 , mapping of a steady-state non-equilibrium problem onto an effective equilibrium system [36][37][38][39] , non-linear response theory approach to current fluctuations 40 ; (3) numerical methods: time-dependent density matrix renormalization group (RG) 41 , time-dependent numerical RG 42 , diagrammatic Monte Carlo 43 , and imaginary-time nonequilibrium quantum Monte Carlo 44 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%