2022
DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2022.0093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image synthesis of effective atomic number images using a deep convolutional neural network-based generative adversarial network

Abstract: Materials and methods:The image synthesis framework to obtain the effective atomic number images from a single-energy CT image at 120 kVp using a CNN-based GAN was developed. The evaluation metrics were the mean absolute error (MAe), relative root mean square error (rMse), relative mean square error (Mse), structural similarity index (ssIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (psNr), and mutual information (MI). results:The difference between the reference and synthetic effective atomic numbers was within 9.7% in all … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MAE, PSNR, and SSIM were employed to compare Gen-VMI 40keV and VMI 40keV in this study. These three metrics are commonly used for image quality assessment in the field of image processing, and may help measure the similarity between Gen-VMI 40keV and VMI 40keV , with SSIM showing a correlation with the perceived quality within the context of the human visual system [35][36][37]. The results revealed that all models achieved PSNR and SSIM values above 40 and 0.98, respectively, in the validation dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…MAE, PSNR, and SSIM were employed to compare Gen-VMI 40keV and VMI 40keV in this study. These three metrics are commonly used for image quality assessment in the field of image processing, and may help measure the similarity between Gen-VMI 40keV and VMI 40keV , with SSIM showing a correlation with the perceived quality within the context of the human visual system [35][36][37]. The results revealed that all models achieved PSNR and SSIM values above 40 and 0.98, respectively, in the validation dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%