2017
DOI: 10.18287/2412-6179-2017-41-6-920-930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image splicing localization based on CFA-artifacts analysis

Abstract: 1 Самарский национальный исследовательский университет имени академика С.П. Королева, Самара, Россия, 2 Институт систем обработки изображений РАН -филиал ФНИЦ «Кристаллография и фотоника» РАН, Самара, Россия Аннотация Встраивание в изображение областей, скопированных из другого изображения, является од-ним из часто осуществляемых видов подделки изображений. Данная статья посвящена исследо-ванию одного из методов их обнаружения, работа которого основана на анализе артефактов, обусловленных параметрами сенсора… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly, the tampered images that come from the Internet involve economic, political, media, military, technology, medical, and judicial fields [Wei, Wang and Ma (2017)] and thus can give a very bad influence on the country and society. In this case, the image splicing detection techniques are of significant scientific importance, but they are traditionally concentrated on using the methods of pattern noise [Siwei, Xunyu and Xing (2014); Yao, Wang, Zhang et al (2017)], color filter array (CFA) [Ferrara, Bianchi, De Rosa et al (2012); Varlamova and Kuznetsov (2017)] and blocking [Bianchi and Piva (2012), Bianchi, De Rosa and Piva (2011)] to detect, which have some drawbacks because they need some prior information and can only handle a certain type of forgery. Moreover, the current image splicing detection technologies can only solve whether an image has undergone splicing, without the ability to locate the tampered region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly, the tampered images that come from the Internet involve economic, political, media, military, technology, medical, and judicial fields [Wei, Wang and Ma (2017)] and thus can give a very bad influence on the country and society. In this case, the image splicing detection techniques are of significant scientific importance, but they are traditionally concentrated on using the methods of pattern noise [Siwei, Xunyu and Xing (2014); Yao, Wang, Zhang et al (2017)], color filter array (CFA) [Ferrara, Bianchi, De Rosa et al (2012); Varlamova and Kuznetsov (2017)] and blocking [Bianchi and Piva (2012), Bianchi, De Rosa and Piva (2011)] to detect, which have some drawbacks because they need some prior information and can only handle a certain type of forgery. Moreover, the current image splicing detection technologies can only solve whether an image has undergone splicing, without the ability to locate the tampered region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%