The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/6538610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Restoration by a Mixed High-Order Total Variation and l1 Regularization Model

Abstract: Total variation regularization is well-known for recovering sharp edges; however, it usually produces staircase artifacts. In this paper, in order to overcome the shortcoming of total variation regularization, we propose a new variational model combining high-order total variation regularization and l1 regularization. The new model has separable structure which enables us to solve the involved subproblems more efficiently. We propose a fast alternating method by employing the fast iterative shrinkage-threshold… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is obvious that when θ = , φ θ reduces to the famous CHKS smoothing function, θ = , φ θ reduces to the famous Fischer-Burmeister smoothing function. As we all know, these two smoothing functions and their variants have been widely used in designing smoothing-type methods for solving mathematical programming problems, such as the nonlinear complementarity problems (NCPs) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22], the second-order cone complementarity problems(SOCCPs) [23][24][25][26][27][28][29], the second-order cone programming (SOCP) [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Smoothing Function and Its Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is obvious that when θ = , φ θ reduces to the famous CHKS smoothing function, θ = , φ θ reduces to the famous Fischer-Burmeister smoothing function. As we all know, these two smoothing functions and their variants have been widely used in designing smoothing-type methods for solving mathematical programming problems, such as the nonlinear complementarity problems (NCPs) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22], the second-order cone complementarity problems(SOCCPs) [23][24][25][26][27][28][29], the second-order cone programming (SOCP) [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Smoothing Function and Its Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this issue, blind deconvolution [2] is often used in the literature to estimate the original image and the PSF from the blurred image, g ( x,y ). Several techniques, such as maximum likelihood method [3], simulated annealing [4], Richardson–Lucy algorithm [5], and total variation [6, 7], are proposed to solve this problem. However, many of these algorithms are iterative or recursive thus they are potentially unstable, divergent and time‐consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Staircase solutions developed false edges that do not exist in the true image. To alleviate this drawback, many improved variation models have been proposed, such as high-order TV regularization methods [29][30][31] and fractional order TV model. [32][33][34][35] Combining the first-order and second-order TV regularizations, Papafitsoros and Schönlieb 36 proposed a hybrid variational model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%