2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.81.024304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image reconstruction techniques applied to nuclear mass models

Abstract: A new procedure is presented that combines well-known nuclear models with image reconstruction techniques. A color-coded image is built by taking the differences between measured masses and the predictions given by the different theoretical models. This image is viewed as part of a larger array in the (N, Z) plane, where unknown nuclear masses are hidden, covered by a "mask." We apply a suitably adapted deconvolution algorithm, used in astronomical observations, to "open the window" and see the rest of the pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the present calculations agree very well with the MC01 PIMC results. Figure 8 portrays now similar comparisons with another set of first principle simulations, namely the Coupled-Electron-Ion Monte-Carlo (CEIMC) calculations of Morales et al (2010a), probing the very pressuredissociation/ionization regime, between ρ = 0.7 g cm −3 and 2.4 g cm −3 . Remember that in this regime, both the present and Becker et al (2014) EOS calculations rely on QMD simulations.…”
Section: Comparison With Ab Initio Calculationssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the present calculations agree very well with the MC01 PIMC results. Figure 8 portrays now similar comparisons with another set of first principle simulations, namely the Coupled-Electron-Ion Monte-Carlo (CEIMC) calculations of Morales et al (2010a), probing the very pressuredissociation/ionization regime, between ρ = 0.7 g cm −3 and 2.4 g cm −3 . Remember that in this regime, both the present and Becker et al (2014) EOS calculations rely on QMD simulations.…”
Section: Comparison With Ab Initio Calculationssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…(1) For T < ∼ 10 3 K, hydrogen becomes solid over some pressure/density range. The melting line for H 2 has been determined experimentally up to T 1000 K, P 100 GPa (Datchi et al 2000, Deemyad & Silvera 2008, Eremets & Trojan 2009 and has been extrapolated up to about 300 GPa by the following fonctional form (Kechin 1995), based on QMD simulations (Bonev et al 2004, Morales et al 2010a, Caillabet et al 2011 2 ):…”
Section: The Hydrogen Equation Of Statementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the former mass relations, the accuracies of these global mass models are worse. Therefore, several methods have been introduced to improve their accuracies, such as the CLEAN image reconstruction technique [28], the radial basis function approach [29][30][31][32][33], and the neural network approach [34][35][36]. After Burbidge's systematic introduction to the r process for the first time [37], due to the lag of experimental and theoretical development, only the phenomenological nuclear droplet mass formula [38] could be considered for the r-process calculations in a long period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%