2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08451.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image reconstruction technique and optical monitoring of the QSO2237+0305 from Maidanak Observatory in 2002-2003

Abstract: We have observed the gravitational lens system Q2237+0305 from the Maidanak Observatory over the period from 2002 August to 2003 November. Here we report the results of our observations. We implemented a two‐stage technique that has been developed specifically for the purpose of gravitational lens image reconstruction. The technique is based on the Tikhonov regularization approach and allows one to obtain astrometric and photometric characteristics of the gravitational lens system. Light curves with 78 data po… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
18
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 (see Table 2), that the light curves of all the components are highly correlated, both in the R filter (our observations), and in the V band (OGLE data). It should be noted however that the R light curves built from the same Maidanak data by the Moscow group, (Koptelova et al 2005) differ from our light curves, with the cross correlation indices being much lower than those shown in Table 2, and ranging from 0.2 to 0.7. If the light curves observed during the time period from June 27 to October 12, 2003, represent a quasar intrinsic brightness change, then its amplitude seen in different lensed images is believed to be the same.…”
Section: Quasar Intrinsic Brightness Fluctuation Amplitudecontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…2 (see Table 2), that the light curves of all the components are highly correlated, both in the R filter (our observations), and in the V band (OGLE data). It should be noted however that the R light curves built from the same Maidanak data by the Moscow group, (Koptelova et al 2005) differ from our light curves, with the cross correlation indices being much lower than those shown in Table 2, and ranging from 0.2 to 0.7. If the light curves observed during the time period from June 27 to October 12, 2003, represent a quasar intrinsic brightness change, then its amplitude seen in different lensed images is believed to be the same.…”
Section: Quasar Intrinsic Brightness Fluctuation Amplitudecontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Stetson, Davis & Crabtree 1990;Magain, Courbin & Sohy 1998;Lupton et al 2001;Koptelova et al 2005). The majority of these methods requires the assumption of PSF invariance over the frame.…”
Section: T H E a Da P T I V E P S F -F I T T I N G P H Oto M E T R I mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 we show system subframes (left panels), model subframes (middle panels), and residual subframes (right panels) corresponding to five frames in the g band. To check the reliability of our PSF fitting procedure, we applied a deconvolution technique (Koptelova et al 2005) to two sets of frames in October-December 2005 (gr bands). The relative instrumental magnitudes from the deconvolution method agreed with the records from the PSF fitting technique (see Fig.…”
Section: Instrumental Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%