2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2006.08.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image reconstruction for the ClearPET™ Neuro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, 2006). Careful estimation of the sensitivity matrix was thus required to minimize artefacts in the images, and the scanner geometry has necessarily to be considered in the reconstruction algorithms (Weber et al. , 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 2006). Careful estimation of the sensitivity matrix was thus required to minimize artefacts in the images, and the scanner geometry has necessarily to be considered in the reconstruction algorithms (Weber et al. , 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PlanTIS has a geometry (see Figure 1c) that is quite different from that of a conventional scanner in which the rings (360°) are fully equipped with detectors (Mosset et al, 2006). Careful estimation of the sensitivity matrix was thus required to minimize artefacts in the images, and the scanner geometry has necessarily to be considered in the reconstruction algorithms (Weber et al, 2006). In addition, a normalization procedure was performed to correct for detector inhomogeneity.…”
Section: Plant Tomographic Imaging System (Plantis)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative analysis of the distribution of 11 C-isotope in the root/soil volume was conducted by a PET setup dedicated for plant analysis (PLANTIS) based in the CLEARPET-system (Streun et al 2006) in a coincidence design. Reconstruction used the specifically designed algorithms (Weber et al 2006).…”
Section: Analysis Of Root Structure and Function In Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this aim, the GATE Monte-Carlo package was used in combination with the software for tomographic image reconstruction (STIR, version 2) to simulate: (i) a novel highly uniform 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) plane source, based on a thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plate, to obtain reconstructed plane source images and (ii) a conventional 18 F-FDG line source, to obtain the point spread function (PSF) of line source reconstructed images, for comparison. In the past few years, ongoing work on STIR reconstruction for large commercial PET scanners has been carried out [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. None of these, however, simulate the GE Discovery ST scanner that is used in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%