2019
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.20786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Quality of Iodine Maps for Pulmonary Embolism: A Comparison of Subtraction CT and Dual-Energy CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed description of the sample size calculation is included in Appendix E1 (online). A subset of the resulting images was used in our previous study, in which we compared the image quality of the subtraction CT and dual-energy CT iodine maps (22). This involved a subjective image quality comparison using the first 60 participants included in the present study and the objective comparison of iodine enhancement in 29 participants with acute PE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the sample size calculation is included in Appendix E1 (online). A subset of the resulting images was used in our previous study, in which we compared the image quality of the subtraction CT and dual-energy CT iodine maps (22). This involved a subjective image quality comparison using the first 60 participants included in the present study and the objective comparison of iodine enhancement in 29 participants with acute PE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Via Dual-energy CT with associated iodine maps for perfusion defect detection, the expert radiologists easily picked up false negative AI reports. In future updates, the AI tool should implement those iodine maps as well, to decrease false negative results [6,[24][25][26]. Even though AI solution may potentially identify PE and thus assist radiologists, ultimately, we have to weigh the significance of such findings, which is for PE in most cases location-bound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McDonald et al, calculated in their study on the influence of technological advancements of crosssectional imaging on the radiology workflow, that a radiologist analyses an average of one image every three seconds [5]. This timeintensive encumbrance on the practicing radiologist, can accrue an increase in false negative results and misdiagnosis [6][7][8]. Real-time double reading by a peer is often done, which has been proved to aid in lowering the prevalence of misdiagnosis, however it is very labor-intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One option is to perform subtraction CT (Fig. ), which has been implemented in clinical practice to depict perfusion defects caused by pulmonary embolism . This technique generates an iodine map by subtracting a precontrast CT image from a contrast‐enhanced CT image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), which has been implemented in clinical practice to depict perfusion defects caused by pulmonary embolism. 5,6 This technique generates an iodine map by subtracting a precontrast CT image from a contrast-enhanced CT image. After removal of vessels, filtering, and adding an appropriate color scale, this iodine map reflects iodine distribution in the pulmonary parenchyma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%