2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image partitioning into convex polygons

Abstract: The over-segmentation of images into atomic regions has become a standard and powerful tool in Vision. Traditional superpixel methods, that operate at the pixel level, cannot directly capture the geometric information disseminated into the images. We propose an alternative to these methods by operating at the level of geometric shapes. Our algorithm partitions images into convex polygons. It presents several interesting properties in terms of geometric guarantees, region compactness and scalability. The overal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Image partition at pixel level requires each element is a small cluster of connected pixels with similar colors. The shape of elements should be regular, and sometimes be convex [DL15], which means that each element is a convex polygon. Unfortunately, partitioning an image into convex polygons is challenging to meet boundary adherence especially partitioning into quad-mesh.…”
Section: Quandrangulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Image partition at pixel level requires each element is a small cluster of connected pixels with similar colors. The shape of elements should be regular, and sometimes be convex [DL15], which means that each element is a convex polygon. Unfortunately, partitioning an image into convex polygons is challenging to meet boundary adherence especially partitioning into quad-mesh.…”
Section: Quandrangulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 13(c) is the result (a) CONPOLY [DL15] (b) N-cuts [SM00] (c) Our method of image reconstruction, and it takes 0.41 seconds for a typical mesh with 1378 patches in the resolution 258*262.…”
Section: Image Vectorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] at the pixel scale gives dense and structure-free 3D models. By postprocessing a DSM with Voronoi clustering [27] or with structure-aware mesh simplification [33], we obtain more compact meshes, but the building structure cannot be not restored. Our output model is both compact and structure-aware (see the low number of principal directions in the distribution of output normals).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our strategy is thus to couple these elevation estimates with the geometric information contained in the polygonal partitions to retrieve building contours even for partially occluded roofs. We denote by P l and P r the polygonal partitions produced by [27] for the left and the right images respectively. P l ⊂ P l represents the set of polygons in P l with elevation estimates.…”
Section: Polygonal Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation