2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-71278-5_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Inpainting with Learnable Feature Imputation

Abstract: A regular convolution layer applying a filter in the same way over known and unknown areas causes visual artifacts in the inpainted image. Several studies address this issue with feature re-normalization on the output of the convolution. However, these models use a significant amount of learnable parameters for feature re-normalization [ 41 , 48 ], or assume a binary representation of the certainty of an output [ 11 , 26 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ren et al (2018) trained a face anonymizer to delete private information and maximize the performance of spatial behavior detection. DeepPrivacy Hukkelås et al, (2020) generates authentic anonymous faces through existing background and sparse pose annotation. CIAGAN Maximov et al, (2020) uses facial key point coordinates and one hot coded identity vector to generate realistic anonymous faces while retaining other necessary features.…”
Section: Conditional Inpainting-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ren et al (2018) trained a face anonymizer to delete private information and maximize the performance of spatial behavior detection. DeepPrivacy Hukkelås et al, (2020) generates authentic anonymous faces through existing background and sparse pose annotation. CIAGAN Maximov et al, (2020) uses facial key point coordinates and one hot coded identity vector to generate realistic anonymous faces while retaining other necessary features.…”
Section: Conditional Inpainting-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method based on antagonistic disturbance (Kingma & Welling, 2013) (Sharif et al, 2016) usually highly depends on the reachability of the target system, requires special training, and has poor robustness. Recent generative-based methods (Hukkelås et al, 2020) (Chen et al, 2020;Guo & Chen, 2019;Hukkelås et al, 2019;Meden et al, 2017;Ren et al, 2018;Sun, Tewari, & Xu, 2018;Zhang, Hu, & Luo, 2018) also have difficulty generating realistic anonymous faces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%