2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2010.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image denoising in contourlet domain based on a normal inverse Gaussian prior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[18][19][20][21]. capture the underlying statistics of the TQWT sub-bands, establishing their suitability and appropriateness thereby.…”
Section: Efficacy Of Nig Parameters In the Tqwt Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21]. capture the underlying statistics of the TQWT sub-bands, establishing their suitability and appropriateness thereby.…”
Section: Efficacy Of Nig Parameters In the Tqwt Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como solución ante distorsiones estructuradas, las más comunes en la adquisición de información visual de fenómenos reales, se han desarrollado métricas complementarias basadas en indicadores similares a los presentes en el sistema de visión humana, como es el caso del SSIM 8 , este es una función dependiente de la luminancia, el contraste y la similaridad estructural [32][33][34], tal como es expresado en (6) e ilustrado explícitamente en (7),…”
Section: Relación Señal-ruidounclassified
“…Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images are extremely affected by speckle noise which causes error decisions about a target. We can refer to VISUShrink, 2 SUREShrink, 3 and BayesShrink 4 for the thresholding and generalized Gaussian mixture, 5 normal inverse Gaussian (NIG 6 ), and generalized Gamma distribution (GΓD) 7 for coefficient modeling. The best denoising method removes more speckle noise and has fewer blurring effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%