2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.02.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image deblurring using tri-segment intensity prior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to prove the effectiveness of the algorithm, this section discusses the subjective and objective assessments to compare the proposed method with other methods. Other methods include Zuo et al [20], Bai et al [26], Zhang et al [27], Gong et al [31], Pan et al [32]. In all experiments, we referred to the above algorithm, through a large number of experiments to verify, the final parameters were set to α = 2, λ = 0.5, γ = 0.001.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In order to prove the effectiveness of the algorithm, this section discusses the subjective and objective assessments to compare the proposed method with other methods. Other methods include Zuo et al [20], Bai et al [26], Zhang et al [27], Gong et al [31], Pan et al [32]. In all experiments, we referred to the above algorithm, through a large number of experiments to verify, the final parameters were set to α = 2, λ = 0.5, γ = 0.001.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, when the above algorithm processes the motion blurred image of the object, the deblurring effect was not obvious, and the background damage was more serious, and the noise was obvious. Compared with the algorithms in [20], [26] and [27], the method proposed in this paper could recover the information of the blurred area in the image very well, as shown in Figs.4 (f)-9(f), The texture of the processed image edges was relatively clear, the noise in the smooth area was well suppressed. In this study, 30 subjects were selected for the subjective evaluation of non-reference quality.…”
Section: A Subjective Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations