2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-20518-8_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Completion with Filtered Low-Rank Tensor Train Approximations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to further improve the performance, we perform the mode permutation [ 19 ] after sampling. Here we give an example of the mode permutation as shown in Figure 3 .…”
Section: Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to further improve the performance, we perform the mode permutation [ 19 ] after sampling. Here we give an example of the mode permutation as shown in Figure 3 .…”
Section: Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mode permutation option can avoid scanning an entire image, which reduces the overall computational complexity [ 19 ].…”
Section: Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the proposed methods with the following: FAN (filtering by adaptive normalization) and EFAN (efficient filtering by adaptive normalization) [60], SmPC-QV (smooth PARAFAC tensor completion with quadratic variation) [38], LRTV (low-rank total-variation) [61], TMAC-inc (low-rank tensor completion by parallel matrix factorization with the rank-increasing) [62], C-SALSA (constrained split augmented Lagrangian shrinkage algorithm) [63], fALS (filtered alternating least-squares) [64], and KA-TT (ket augmentation tensor train) [65]. FAN and EFAN are based on adaptive Gaussian low-pass filtration.…”
Section: Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%