2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-018-5623-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image classification using separable invariant moments of Charlier-Meixner and support vector machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Equation ( 8), n is the image bit width. The MSE is the mean square error, which is defined in Equation (9). X is the ground truth, and F(Y) is the reconstructed image.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Equation ( 8), n is the image bit width. The MSE is the mean square error, which is defined in Equation (9). X is the ground truth, and F(Y) is the reconstructed image.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article does not discuss interpolation-based methods and reconstructed-based methods since these two types of methods are usually treated as traditional methods. For example, moments-based methods are very popular in image reconstruction [8][9][10][11]. Example-based methods establish the relationship between LR and HR images to reconstruct the high-frequency part of the LR images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to point out that some recent methods for computing the invariant moments [ 3 , 17 , 20 , 37 , 39 ] are numerically unstable for large-size images (>1024 × 1024).For this reason, no comparison with these works is carried out. In addition, accelerating and stabilizing the computation of the previously mentioned methods might be a potentially interesting direction for further research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is based on the use of recursive formulas of certain factors involved in RMIs computation. However, this method and others presented in [ 3 , 17 , 20 , 39 ] are not suitable for computing the invariant moments of large-size images (≥1024 × 1024), since these methods involve the use of certain terms depending on gamma and factorial functions when computing the image moment invariants. Motivated by overcoming these problems, a fast and numerically stable computation of large-size image moment invariants is proposed in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, the moment approach is divided into three main categories: The non-orthogonal moments, such as geometric and complex moments [5,6], the continuous orthogonal moments [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], and the discrete orthogonal moments (DOMs). We are going to focus mainly on DOMs such as the moments of Tchebichef [14,15], Krawtchouk [14][15][16][17], Hahn [18], Charlier [19][20][21], and last but not least Meixner [21,22], as these have concrete advantages over 3D image analysis. However, it has been noted that the computation of moments is a complex and costly task in terms of time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%