2020
DOI: 10.1117/1.jatis.6.3.034002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image-based wavefront sensing for astronomy using neural networks

Abstract: Motivated by the potential of nondiffraction limited, real-time computational image sharpening with neural networks in astronomical telescopes, we studied wavefront sensing with convolutional neural networks based on a pair of in-focus and out-of-focus point spread functions. By simulation, we generated a large dataset for training and validation of neural networks and trained several networks to estimate Zernike polynomial approximations for the incoming wavefront. We included the effect of noise, guide star … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with other optimization approaches that rely on iterative methods, including prior information about the experimental setup additionally constrains the optimization process [12]. Compared to neural network approaches [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,24,41], differentiable model-based approaches have the advantage that they don't rely on a predetermined model of sample aberrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other optimization approaches that rely on iterative methods, including prior information about the experimental setup additionally constrains the optimization process [12]. Compared to neural network approaches [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,24,41], differentiable model-based approaches have the advantage that they don't rely on a predetermined model of sample aberrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calibration of instrumental aberrations, through phase diversity approaches, [30][31][32] focal plane sharpening 33 techniques, or even Deep-learning strategies, 34,35 is particularly challenging. First of all, sampling the instrumental aberrations across the fov is feasible by the use of internal fibers within the system, 36,37 but can be potentially time consuming and requires direct control of the system.…”
Section: Scope On Advanced Psf Models and Reconstruction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning offers novel approaches to correct for aberrations encountered when imaging though scattering materials, [1][2][3][4] from astronomy [5][6][7][8][9] to microscopy with transmitted (for example [10][11][12]) and reflected light [13]. To find aberration corrections in these situations, machine learning typically relies on large synthetic datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, training datasets are often based on combinations of Zernike polynomials [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] which might however not accurately capture all aspects of experimentally encountered aberrations. Additionally, for more strongly scattering samples, which require increasingly higher orders of Zernike modes, covering all potential scattering situations by sampling a sufficient number of different mode combinations eventually results in very large datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%