Image-Based Techniques in Cultural Heritage Modeling

Sauerbier, Martin

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28021-4_7

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, Ben Nausner [23] worked on the project 'Virtual Nako' and discussed the workflow used for 3D acquisition and visualisation of the scene that can be finally embedded with Google Earth for public viewing. Sauerbier [24] described the workflow for photogrammetric processing of areal images for generation of a textured 3D model of Tucume, Peru. Koutsoudis et al [12] presented a 'versatile' workflow for making 3D reconstruction models based on a set of open source software.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

To 3D or Not 3D: Choosing a Photogrammetry Workflow for Cultural Heritage Groups

Rahaman

Champion

2019

Heritage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The 3D reconstruction of real-world heritage objects using either a laser scanner or 3D modelling software is typically expensive and requires a high level of expertise. Image-based 3D modelling software, on the other hand, offers a cheaper alternative, which can handle this task with relative ease. There also exists free and open source (FOSS) software, with the potential to deliver quality data for heritage documentation purposes. However, contemporary academic discourse seldom presents survey-based feature lists or a critical inspection of potential production pipelines, nor typically provides direction and guidance for non-experts who are interested in learning, developing and sharing 3D content on a restricted budget. To address the above issues, a set of FOSS were studied based on their offered features, workflow, 3D processing time and accuracy. Two datasets have been used to compare and evaluate the FOSS applications based on the point clouds they produced. The average deviation to ground truth data produced by a commercial software application (Metashape, formerly called PhotoScan) was used and measured with CloudCompare software. 3D reconstructions generated from FOSS produce promising results, with significant accuracy, and are easy to use. We believe this investigation will help non-expert users to understand the photogrammetry and select the most suitable software for producing image-based 3D models at low cost for visualisation and presentation purposes.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

To 3D or Not 3D: Choosing a Photogrammetry Workflow for Cultural Heritage Groups

Rahaman

Champion

2019

Heritage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Computer scientific research is often linked to explicit archaeological and geospatial aspects, e.g. in the context of documentation of archaeological findings and the reconstruction of historical sites (Schäfer et al 2012;Var et al 2013;Bogacz et al 2015) or photogrammetric image processing (Sauerbier 2013;Kersten et al 2014). Referring to this, Bock et al (2013) present a broad range of interdisciplinary studies and therefore introduce the term Computational Humanities.…”

Section: Introducing the Concept Of Digital Geoarchaeologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Geoarchaeology: Bridging the Gap Between Archaeology, Geosciences and Computer Sciences

Siart

Forbriger

Bubenzer

2017

Natural Science in Archaeology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern archaeology increasingly crosses academic boundaries by combining different new methodologies in order to answer research questions about ancient cultures and their remains. Above all, the geosciences became an indispensable counterpart of archaeology and cultural heritage management. As to the investigation of past archaeological landscapes and palaeoenvironments, the term Geoarchaeology is commonly used, representing the utilization of traditional and the development of new geoscientific applications for archaeological purposes. In addition, computationally engaged research became absolute state of the art in modern archaeology, in geoscientific landscape reconstructions and in the deciphering of spatio-temporal interactions between man and nature. Despite this multidisciplinary constellation, the thematic and methodological overlap of humanities, natural sciences and informatics is frequently disregarded. It is beyond debate that multidisciplinary approaches, which especially emerge at the interface of adjacent subjects, substantially contribute to a better understanding of ancient landscapes, their forming processes and the resulting cultural heritage. They allow fusing complementary perspectives for the first time and therefore go far beyond unilateral research designs. Digital Geoarchaeology, which is to be established in this chapter as a new concept for the first time, can therefore be regarded as an intersection of disciplines that contributes to the consolidation of different academic perspectives. It represents a novel approach in terms of computer scientific methods combined with geoscientific know-how and archaeological expertise to multi-methodically investigate past humanenvironmental relationships. Accessing this multidisciplinary interface helps overcome potentially restricted, monodisciplinary perceptions and provides new forms of unbiased approaches for investigating the interplay of man and nature. Thus, closer collaboration and dialogue across disciplinary boundaries will offer promising prospects for future research at the human-environmental interface.

show abstract

Image-Based Techniques in Cultural Heritage Modeling

Cited by 2 publications

References 8 publications

To 3D or Not 3D: Choosing a Photogrammetry Workflow for Cultural Heritage Groups

To 3D or Not 3D: Choosing a Photogrammetry Workflow for Cultural Heritage Groups

Digital Geoarchaeology: Bridging the Gap Between Archaeology, Geosciences and Computer Sciences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About