Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image-based handwritten signature verification using hybrid methods of discrete Radon transform, principal component analysis and probabilistic neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi-script learning approaches could be considered to improve performance on all scripts. Lastly, tables 5, 6, 7 and 8 compare the results we obtained with SPP-Fixed (considering EER user thresholds [40] 10 Contours (chi squared distance) 6.44 Wen et al [41] 5 RPF (HMM) 15.02 Vargas et al [19] 5 LBP (SVM) 11.9 Vargas et al [19] 10 LBP (SVM) 7.08 Ooi et al [42] 5 DRT + PCA (PNN) 13.86 Ooi et al [42] 10 DRT + PCA (PNN) 9.87 Soleimani et al [39] 5 HOG (DMML) 13.44 Soleimani et al [39] 10 HOG (DMML) 9.86 Hafemann et al [6] 10 1 morphology (SVM) 11.81 Kumar et al [45] 1 Surroundness (NN) 8.33 Bharathi and Shekar [46] 12 Chain code (SVM) 7.84 Guerbai et al [12] 4 Curvelet transform (OC-SVM) 8.7 Guerbai et al [12] 8 Curvelet transform (OC-SVM) 7.83 Guerbai et al [12] 12 Curvelet transform (OC-SVM) 5.6 Hafemann et al [6] 12 SigNet-F (SVM) 4.63 (± 0.42) Present Work 10 SigNet-SPP-300dpi 3.60 (± 1.26) Present Work 10 SigNet-SPP-300dpi (finetuned) 2.33 (± 0.88) using genuine signatures and skilled forgeries) with the state-of-the-art in GPDS, MCYT, Cedar and Brazilian PUC-PR, respectively. We observe results competitive to the state of the art in all datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-script learning approaches could be considered to improve performance on all scripts. Lastly, tables 5, 6, 7 and 8 compare the results we obtained with SPP-Fixed (considering EER user thresholds [40] 10 Contours (chi squared distance) 6.44 Wen et al [41] 5 RPF (HMM) 15.02 Vargas et al [19] 5 LBP (SVM) 11.9 Vargas et al [19] 10 LBP (SVM) 7.08 Ooi et al [42] 5 DRT + PCA (PNN) 13.86 Ooi et al [42] 10 DRT + PCA (PNN) 9.87 Soleimani et al [39] 5 HOG (DMML) 13.44 Soleimani et al [39] 10 HOG (DMML) 9.86 Hafemann et al [6] 10 1 morphology (SVM) 11.81 Kumar et al [45] 1 Surroundness (NN) 8.33 Bharathi and Shekar [46] 12 Chain code (SVM) 7.84 Guerbai et al [12] 4 Curvelet transform (OC-SVM) 8.7 Guerbai et al [12] 8 Curvelet transform (OC-SVM) 7.83 Guerbai et al [12] 12 Curvelet transform (OC-SVM) 5.6 Hafemann et al [6] 12 SigNet-F (SVM) 4.63 (± 0.42) Present Work 10 SigNet-SPP-300dpi 3.60 (± 1.26) Present Work 10 SigNet-SPP-300dpi (finetuned) 2.33 (± 0.88) using genuine signatures and skilled forgeries) with the state-of-the-art in GPDS, MCYT, Cedar and Brazilian PUC-PR, respectively. We observe results competitive to the state of the art in all datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ooia (2016) [4] used Radon Transform for feature extraction from images. Discrete Radon Transform (DRT) signifies the image projection at various angles.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, maximum amount of charge at one time and total amount of charge can be found in the design, while horizontal distance and elevation difference should be measured in site. However, many researchers have pointed out that this is not enough to accurately forecast the PPV [26,27]. Instead of using regression coefficient, more measured data should be adopted.…”
Section: Dataset and Dimensionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a huge number of researchers have performed a train of works on combination of ANNs and principal component analysis [4,6,16,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Nevertheless, the application of Mean Impact Value and Factor Analysis is exactly rare in previous research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%