Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1101149.1101305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image annotations by combining multiple evidence & wordNet

Abstract: The development of technology generates huge amounts of non-textual information, such as images. An efficient image annotation and retrieval system is highly desired. Clustering algorithms make it possible to represent visual features of images with finite symbols. Based on this, many statistical models, which analyze correspondence between visual features and words and discover hidden semantics, have been published. These models improve the annotation and retrieval of large image databases. However, current s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
132
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
132
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of [10] make use of WordNet in order to measure the semantic correlation among tags assigned to a seed image. Strongly correlated tags are considered to be relevant to the content of the seed image, whereas weakly correlated tags are considered to be non-relevant.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [10] make use of WordNet in order to measure the semantic correlation among tags assigned to a seed image. Strongly correlated tags are considered to be relevant to the content of the seed image, whereas weakly correlated tags are considered to be non-relevant.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can mention here Bayes Point Machine (Chang et al 2003), Support Vector Machine (Cusano et al 2004) and Decision Trees (Kwasnicka and Paradowski 2008) which all estimate the visual features distributions associated with each word. Some authors try to refine the annotation results by reducing the difference between the expected and resulting word count vectors (Kwasnicka and Paradowski 2006), by using Word-Net which contains semantic relations between words (Jin et al 2005) or by word co-occurrence models coupled with fast random walks (Llorente et al 2009), an interesting approach exploiting the recent advances in graph processing.…”
Section: Related Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paradigm, that has been proficiently used for the automatic annotation of images [4,22], is exploited in SHIATSU for automatically suggesting to the user labels at the shot level. For this, the Annotation Processor (see Fig.…”
Section: Similarity-based Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%