2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image analysis of posterior pole vessels identifies type 1 retinopathy of prematurity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings validate previous studies that measurement of posterior pole morphology can be useful to characterise vessel changes in eyes at risk for ROP 12 13. A high sensitivity for plus diagnosis and a high specificity for no pre-plus/plus disease for three of the four graders and CAIAR was demonstrated when comparing analysis of posterior pole images to clinical examination by indirect ophthalmoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The findings validate previous studies that measurement of posterior pole morphology can be useful to characterise vessel changes in eyes at risk for ROP 12 13. A high sensitivity for plus diagnosis and a high specificity for no pre-plus/plus disease for three of the four graders and CAIAR was demonstrated when comparing analysis of posterior pole images to clinical examination by indirect ophthalmoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…30,32-42 The NM-200D (NIDEK Inc, Fremont, CA) is a narrow-angle non-contact 30 degree digital camera. 43 It has been studied for ROP screening and for image analysis in plus disease. 39-41,44,45 Finally, the Kowa handheld fundus camera (Kowa Optimed Inc, Torrance, CA) has also been used to study image analysis in plus disease.…”
Section: Quantitative Image Analysis For Plus Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 The NM200D camera provides narrow field images so that only 30 degrees, typically centered on the optic nerve, are analyzed. 39,43,45 Information provided to experts during image review. In some studies, experts have been asked to identify presence of plus disease by comparing retinal images side-by-side to an image of the standard published photograph.…”
Section: Challenge #1: Definition Of a Reference Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2010, Salcone and colleagues reviewed the current evidence on the use of retinal digital imaging for ROP screening 18 . The authors identified six prospective studies that evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of digital images in the use of ROP screening 29–33 . From these studies, the sensitivities of detecting ROP were found to range from 0.46 to 0.97 and the specificity for detecting ROP was uniformly high, ranging from 0.89 to 1.00.…”
Section: Digital Retinal Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%