The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1109/msp.2017.2696576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Aesthetic Assessment: An experimental survey

Abstract: Abstract-This survey aims at reviewing recent computer vision techniques used in the assessment of image aesthetic quality. Image aesthetic assessment aims at computationally distinguishing high-quality photos from low-quality ones based on photographic rules, typically in the form of binary classification or quality scoring. A variety of approaches has been proposed in the literature trying to solve this challenging problem. In this survey, we present a systematic listing of the reviewed approaches based on v… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
185
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
185
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S P IC E = F 1 Scor e = 2 * P r ecision * Recall pr ecision + Recall (9) As shown in Table 4, our model is superior to the method proposed by the PCCD [4] in various attributes. The PCCD method [4] uses the attribute fusion training method, which combines the three attributes of Composition, Color and Lighting, Subject of Photo.…”
Section: Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…S P IC E = F 1 Scor e = 2 * P r ecision * Recall pr ecision + Recall (9) As shown in Table 4, our model is superior to the method proposed by the PCCD [4] in various attributes. The PCCD method [4] uses the attribute fusion training method, which combines the three attributes of Composition, Color and Lighting, Subject of Photo.…”
Section: Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The release of two cropping databases [39,13] facilitates the training of discriminative cropping models. However, the handcrafted features are not strong enough to accurately predict image aesthetics [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two objective metrics, namely intersection-overunion (IoU) and boundary displacement error (BDE) [14], were defined to evaluate the performance of image cropping models on these databases. These public benchmarks enable many researchers to develop and test their cropping models, significantly facilitating the research on automatic image cropping [39,11,34,5,6,10,15,22,36]. Though many efforts have been made, there exists sev- Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They allow the creation of models that can analyze any picture and predict their aesthetic value, without the need for any annotated data about its contents; and without making use of hand-crafted features. Some examples of the use of CNNs for image aesthetics prediction and related topics can be found in [2,20,33,6,11,4,9,35,10,17]. Some of those papers make use of information about the contents of the pictures to improve the predictions of the models.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Computational Aesthetic Assessment In Photomentioning
confidence: 99%